The Sacred Traditions

In earliest Sumerian tradition, dating back some 4,800 years, Sargon I (Egyptian-Greek: ''Sa-Archon'' - ''Son of the Ruler'', Egyptian Gnostic ''Son of the Creator''), aka Sargon the Great, was titled ''The Sakhar (Baptism) Lord'' and referred to himself as a fire priest. (See The Phoenician Origin of Britons, Scots and Anglo-Saxons by Lawrence Waddell).

In earliest Khemetic (Egyptian) tradition, dating back to over 5,200 years ago, Seker (also written as Sokar) - perhaps the earliest of all Egyptian deities, was known as the guardian/opener of the ways and the deity of resurrection.

During the Khemetic period referred to today as the Old Kingdom (4,200-4,700 years ago), the deities Ptah (Pth, circa app 4,700 BC) and Osiris (Wsjr/Usir, circa app 4,500 BC) were created and grafted onto the traditions regarding Seker in order to create the Egyptian trinity known as Pth(Ptah)-Zkr(Seker)-Wsjr/Usir (Osiris). Ptah embodies the Khemetic creator ''father'' deity aspect after whom Khemet was, in Ptolemaic times, renamed ''Egypt'', while Osir(is) is a deified posthumous ruler whom was used to typify the ''Holy Ghost'' aspect. Seker thereafter becoming errantly relegated to the aspect of Son (Sa) of Ptah (Ker). Thus, Seker was dissected into three separate ''aspects'' which were then simultaneously merged back into one deity as the Egyptian Holy Trinity referencing the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. Note, however, that although Ptah was considered the creator (father figure) over all mortal creation, he is not the ''Ker'' referenced in the name Seker. Seker is not the son of Ptah but rather the Son of the Almighty through whom mortal manifestation itself was thereafter formed by Ptah. Ptah was not the supreme creator deity, however: he was simply the creator deity of the the lower, material realm of temporal matter in which we, as animated corpses, presently exist.

In Greek, Seker / Sokar was called Socharis / Sokaris. Also in Greek, Osiris' son Hor(us) (created approximately 4,200 BC) had an interesting tutelary epithet: he was titled IUSA KRST The ''Ever manifesting (IU - from which the term ''Jew'' was later derived) Son of (SA) Ptah (KR), with the Greek (ST) possessive suffix applied at the end. IUSA KRST is obviously a derivative of Sokaris, albeit with the addition of the IU prefix and the transliteration of the IS suffix into the ST suffix. Of course, the original source of Horus' epithet would not have carried the IU (ever-manifesting) prefix, which in itself indicates that a basis for such an epithet would have predated the epithet here-in utilized. 

The term Jesus Christ is in reality a tutelary epithet as well, derived from the term IUSA KRST... Christ and KRST in turn assimilating with the Greek terms for ''anointed'' (Charis/Chrism) and thus in turn assimilating back to the Hebrew terms for anointed (Messiah, Moshe: Moses) which in turn are themselves derived from the Egyptian term for anointing (Messeh) in reference to a sacred ruler-ship. As such, we see in these terms, several other titles: Socharis meaning ''Anointed Son (Charis-Sa): Seker meaning Son (Sa/So) Ker (King): IU SA KR meaning ''Ever Manifesting Son King'': and JeSus Christ meaning ''Jew (Je) Son (Sus) Anointed/King (Chris). Simply stated, the Egyptian Seker became in Greek Sokaris, who lent his name to the Greek epithet for Horus (IUSA KRST), which in turn lent itself to the epithet JeSus Christ. Since one can easily see through history and phonetics that the K and CH interchange in many European and Middle Eastern dialects, just as the S and the Z do in Egyptian Hieroglyphs, and that all vowel forms in Egyptian hieroglyphs were interchangeable since hieroglyphs consisted of only consonants, this pattern of reuse albeit in minor modified forms, is apparent. 

Socharis is phonetically identical to the title of the firstborn Son of Zeus in Greek tradition. This Son-aspect of Zeus is Zagreus. Note again that the S and Z interchange in Khemetic hieroglyphs: that the ch/k and g interchange throughout ancient European and Middle Eastern dialects: and that the addition of a vowel followed by an S or ST is often an indication of a non-Greek term that has been Hellenized by the Greeks. That being said, there is further proof to uphold the connection between the Egyptian Seker and the Greek Zagreus. It has been well-known for many centuries that Dionysus is a Greek plagiary of the Egyptian Osiris. Dionysus was the ''second-born Zagreus'' to the Greeks, just as Osiris was the ''resurrected Seker'' to the Egyptians. While the latter Greeks traditions distinguish between the first-born Zagreus and the second-born Dionysus, the much-earlier Egyptian tradition hides such truth.

The term Osiris was not any specific person's original name but rather a title-name added afterwards in order to define an (in Osiris's case, ''posthumous'') aspect which is even repeated in the New Testament parallel regarding the Raising of ''Lazarus''. In many Egyptian papyri, such as the epic The Papyrus of Ani, the person for whom the papyrus is written refers to them-self as ''the Osiris (followed by their name)''. Osiris was a title used to reference a person of formerly noble status whom either passed on or whom had stepped down from their previous station. 

Zagreus was the ''first-born'' son of the Greek deity Zeus, whom Zeus intended to have rule over mankind. The Greek Zeus, in turn, equates to the Roman Jupiter - often referred to in ancient times as Zeus-Pater (Father Zeus). The Latin term Pater is derived directly from the Egyptian creator (Father) deity Ptah after whom many paternal terms refer, such as Peter, Patrick, Paternal, Paternity, etc. In Greek tradition, Zeus (Ptah) conceived a son named Zagreus (''Socharis'') whom after he was murdered in a manner very similar to that of the pre-resurrected Osiris, was then resurrected as Dionysus (Osiris).

Osiris had ''two sons'' (in reality, two aspects of one son): the ''first-born'' Anubis (created of flesh) - created before Osiris was referred to as Osiris - and the ''posthumously conceived'' (''second-born'') Horus (created of spirit). If this same set of circumstances is applied to the New testament, one would have the following play out: John the Baptist is the first-born son of Zechariah (Seker-Iah). Zechariah is cut off from the priesthood at the same time that John is simultaneously ''beheaded'' from his birthright station as the New Kohen Gadol (High Priest) by Herod. At this very point, Zechariah (Seker Iah) becomes the second-born son Lazarus (El Osiris) = Dionysus - and John becomes the new Zechariah (IUSA KRST: Jesus Christ). John as Anubis initiates the raising (resurrection) of his father Lazarus (El Osiris) in order for John (Anubis) himself to be reborn as the new Zechariah (IUSA KRST/Jesus Christ).

To see the picture become much clearer, it would be worth reading the previous paragraph again after realizing what follows: the Iah suffix on the title-name Zechariah means Lord, which reveals that the root of the title Zechariah is Zechar; the term Baptist is in itself a reference to the Sumerian term for Baptist (Sakhar), meaning that calling John ''The Baptist'' is at its core the same as calling him Seker. He may have been named John at birth, but he was titled Zechar (Sakhar: Baptist) after his father nonetheless. Zechariah being struck down between the temple and the altar is synonymous with John being ''beheaded'' in that both instances are allegorical references to them being usurped from the High Priesthood by the Herodians. Devoid of the later Hellenized suffix ''us'', the term Lazarus becomes LAzar: the L being synonymous with the Hebrew El (meaning Lord), and Azar being synonymous with the Egyptian Osiris. the first-born son John as Anubis raises his father in order to himself become the second-born son Horus: IUSA KRST: Jesus Christ. It was at this point that the messianic aspect of the usage of the Jesus title was fulfilled, and it was the fallout from this very event (the resurrection of Zechariah-Osiris by his son John-Zechariah) that caused the Romans and the Herodians to plot Jesus' death.      

Keeping in mind that the Gospels were first written in Greek by Hellenized Jews, according to the Greek understanding of Khemetic tradition, Seker was thought to be the son of the Almighty Creator Ptah, whereas Anubis-Horus was the son of Osiris and his wife Isis and his ''brother's wife'' Nephthys. The Greeks, however were entirely wrong: Osiris was the son of man, Ptah was the creator of the mundane world, and Seker was the son of neither Ptah nor Osiris, but rather of the Most High. In Greek mythology, Zeus (the planet Jupiter) was the ''rock'' which created all the other planets and thus the known world within our solar system, with no apparent regard for anything beyond such. In the Khemetic original, however, Seker was not a subject of Jupiter/Zeus/Ptah's creativity, but rather was a completely separate sovereign assigned by the Most High to patrol and temper Ptah's overzealous, often blood-thirsty ''creativity'' and to assist spirits in rejoining their souls from their bondage in flesh (''slavery in Egypt''). 

Moses is credited with leading a pilgrimage out of  ''slavery in Egypt'' into the ''promised land''. It's interesting that in the film ''The Ten Commandments'', after the killing of the firstborn sons of Egypt in an attempted regicidal coup and the subsequent banishment of the Hebrews from Egypt, the Pharaoh is shown placing his dead son's corpse into the arms of a statue of a certain deity referred to as Sokar (Seker). Why this is so interesting, is that not long afterwards, Moses was said to have climbed a certain mount and to have met with a certain deity named YHWH, who shortly thereafter referred to himself as his Zeker unto all generations. Exodus 3:15 states; "God, furthermore, said to Moses, "Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, 'The LORD (Yahweh), the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is My Zeker to all generations."

The reason for the Hebrew confusion regarding the term Seker/Zeker can be found in the Hebrews' motives. The Old Testament admits that Jacob was a criminal - his name even means ''supplanter'', ''deceiver'' in Hebrew, which is most likely why it was later changed to ''Israel''. For example, the Jacob's Pillow myth is plagiarized directly from a much earlier Egyptian tradition known as The Sinuhe Epic, while the Jacob's ladder myth is basically an admission of guilt regarding a nocturnal grave-robbing expedition. Exodus likewise attests to the Hebrews ''spoiling Egypt''. Of course, again, ancient Egypt prior to the Ptolemaic era was referred to as Khemet: the term Egypt was created by the Greeks, which literally means ''House/Temple of Ptah''... the Hebrews didn't pillage all of Khemet, but rather its temples. What was their objective? To learn the Egyptian written traditions in order to ascribe them to themselves while simultaneously vilifying the sources of such.

That the Hebrews whom left Khemet alongside Moses spoiled the ''Temples'' of Ptah is obvious, and it wasn't the first time a Semitic peoples had spoiled ''Egypt'' in that era: Akhenaten had done likewise not long before Moses and the Hebrews. The main problem for the Hebrews by the time of the Exodus was, however, that due to their own lack of true understanding of the significance of written traditions, they had pillaged things which they still did not truly understand, which led to mistranslations such as the Zeker enigma. In Hebrew, when YHWH told Moses that ''this is to be my Zeker unto all generations'', the Hebrew commoner would not have been able to fully grasp the reference to the Egyptian deity Seker in YHWH's message - especially since the Hebrews of that time had no written traditions - only oral ones to pass along. Oral traditions are extremely susceptible to manipulation, deception and alteration, whereas written traditions are far-harder to overtly alter.  

Since the Khemetic abode of the deity Seker was likewise where the written records (memories: memorials) of the Khemetic ''first time'' (Zep Tepi) were kept, the Hall of Seker was likewise referred to as the Hall of Records, and as such the Hebrews, obviously in awe of the concept of historical traditions being recorded in writing, assimilated the term Zeker with the written records of Egypt and as such, made the term Zeker their word for memories, records and memorials.

The passage in Exodus regarding YHWH's ''memorial'' is no less profound than the real purpose of the use of the term ''memory'' in Ecclesiastes 9, which is a direct reference to the Leo Constellation (the Tribe of Benjamin, which was supplanted by Judah - from which the ''Sons of Man'' come) and to Sirius (the Dog Star, from which the ''Sons of God'' come). This can be seen echoed in the two solstices as well: the Summer Sun roaring as Leo in all its glory indicating the son of man, and the rise of Sirius in the dead winter sky as the Star of Bethlehem indicating the Son of God resurrecting the Sun of man from its dead winter death.

And so Moses had a brother named Aaron, who is seen likewise in the Heavens as Orion with Sirius as his loyal companion. It was from the lineage of Aaron that the High Priests (Kohens Gadol) of Israel were to be born. This lineage included John the Baptist, who was to be the last Kohen Gadol of the Age of Aries (Agnes Dei: Ram of God), before, like Orion in the late Autumn sky, being beheaded by the serpent Herut/Herod in order to be reborn as the first Kohen Gadol of the Age of Pisces (the Fisher of Man). The First (High Priest of Pisces) shall be the Last (High Priest of Aries).

The South of France had been a hotbed of heretic teaching for many centuries by the time that the Catholic Church rounded up and murdered the Cathars. Not long afterwards, the Catholic Church was on the march in the South of France again - this time against the Knights Templar. What did these two groups have in common that was such a threat to the church of Rome? Several things: first, they viewed the world through a dualistic, gnostic viewpoint. Second, they both knew that the Roman Jesus figure was a demonic myth created to salvage an otherwise dying empire at the expense of the nlightenment of the masses regarding their true destiny. Third, a certain Mountain fortress in the Midi-Languedoc region that is called Montsegur.

The mount called Montsegur is the basis for the grail epics regarding the Mount of Salvation. That said, note that the term Mont is synonymous with the term Mount. Thus, we are left with the remainder Segur - being equated with Salvation. What is curious about this, is that the term Segur is non-existent on its own in any language- yet it is found in the term Montsegur, which in turn is the basis for the Grail traditions regarding the Sacred Mount of Salvation. The reason why is simple: Segur phonetically equates to Seker, and Seker, in turn equates to the deity of resurrection (salvation) whose abode (the Hall of records) was to be found within the base of the Great Pyramid - the Sacred Mountain. The Cathars and the Knights Templar knew much more about the origins of Christianity than the Romans did, and that left Rome feeling extremely compromised and vulnerable.

Meanwhile back in Rome, there was a certain street that was referred to as the ''Sacred Way'': in Latin it is known as ''Via Sacra''. The street leading up to the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem is likewise called the Via Sacra... that is, again, the ''Sacred Way''. The Dome of the Rock, in turn, is referred to in Arabic as ''Qubbat al Sakhra - qubbat meaning ''dome''. Likewise, in Sargon's home nation, his holy mountains were called Ziggurats... in Egypt, there is Saqqara... in Lanquedoc, Montsegur... the Hall of Seker below the Giza Pyramid... all of these referring to sanctity and sacredness, all referencing a path to a sacred mount, a rock within the sacred mount, and or the mount itself, and all being phonetically assimilated to the Khemetic deity Seker. It should also be added, that the English term ''sacred'' is likewise derived (through the Latin Sacra/Sacre) from the name of the Egyptian deity Seker, as opposed to the Greek term ''holy'', which is derived from the Greek term ''helios'' which is a reference to the sun and thus implies solar (mortal/idol) worship and which likewise is the basis for the English term ''hell''. Such is why any true reference to the Sacra Couer (the Sacred Heart) could never be found within a book titled ''Holy (Helios) Bible (Biblios)'' - the ''Book of the Sun'': such would be like placing the keys to the gates of Heaven in the hands of the Devil himself.

And so the Imperial Catholic Church went about murdering off the Cathars and the Knights Templar. But of course the Knights Templar learned a thing or two about the affairs of the world from the fate of the Cathars. Some say they went to Scotland  - some say they voyaged on to the New World. And some of us know that many laid low in the Swiss Alps: for surely a ''live dog'' is better than a ''dead lion'' - for the dead know nothing, nor do they any longer have a reward, for their Zeker is forgotten. Truth is, Benjamin preceded Judah, and Benjamin will prevail long beyond Judah. The first shall be the last... Il mach Secur.

joHN ZEKERiah 

The heavens run on electricity, not carbon-based life forms.