Conception, Crucifixion and Continuity

Forward

When attempting to truly understand something that is not readily apparent, it is important to first understand the underlying context in play. In the late first century BC, the Age of Aries was drawing to a close, leading many faithful Jews to anxiously await the return of their messiah in a land of chaos, corruption and spiritual confusion. This was of no small coincidence: the previous manifestation of the Jewish Messiah had occurred at the end of the previous age when Aries (the Lamb of God) supplanted Taurus (Baal - the Bull of Heaven), at which time the Messianic Messiah "Moses/Moshe" led his followers out of "slavery" in "Egypt". As such, the Messianic Jews at Jesus' time were awaiting the return of the Messiah amidst a backdrop of corruption, treachery and apostasy at the end of the Age of Aries, not unlike what they had faced in Egypt over two thousand years prior.

If I were able to lead others into a way of peace and withheld, what value would I have? If I were to lead others down a path of ruination, what would be my testament? My value or liability is in the remembrance which I bring about.

Alternate Theory versus Actual Truth

While what follows does not always fit in with the Roman or Jewish "orthodox" accounts of occurrences in Egypt and the Levant some 2,000-5,000 years ago, that does not mean that what follows is not true and accurate. It is up to the reader to take what follows and to apply severe critique, and to come to their own conclusions. This book is not about leading readers astray with atheistic "comparative religious studies" that only serve to debase and destroy faith. What follows is simply a clearer picture of the context that has been left hidden in plain sight for thousands of years regarding the motives, beliefs and actions of the ancients.

There were many forces at play in the Middle East, Europe and North Africa at the close of the late first millennium BC, that - partly in ignorance, partly out of fear, and in some cases, partly out of avarice - corrupted and rewrote the historical  syntax of those and earlier times. It is important to note that many if not all of those same forces are still in play today. Unfortunately, a large portion of what is considered to be actual truth today is, in reality, alternate theory that has been incessantly indoctrinated into the psyches of mankind in order to uphold those forces. What is contained in these pages is not alternate theory: it is the actual truth which had been vilified, plagiarized and ignored for far too long.

Subjective Comparisons versus Objective Coincidences

Baal, Aries and Moses

Looking back to the close of the Age of Taurus (Baal), there is a trove of hidden wisdom to be found. For example, in the incident regarding the Baal worshippers at the base of the Holy Mount. In the period encompassing the close of the Age of Taurus and the beginning of the Age of Aries, after officiating over the first Passover, Moses led his followers out of "slavery" in "Egypt" before climbing the Sacred Mount (Mount Cyon) in order to meet with the Almighty. Upon his descent back to the base of the Sacred Mount, he found that some of his followers had created an idol to the Golden Calf (Baal, aka Taurus), which provoked him to order that those Baal worshippers be killed.

The First Pass Over

The first Passover sacrifice was held just prior to the Jews journey out of "slavery" in "Egypt". That first Passover stood in stark contrast to previous sacrificial rituals in that it was the first time that a Paschal Lamb (symbolizing the Age of Aries) was slaughtered to atone for the sins of the Jews. That's not to say that lambs weren't slaughtered before this time, but rather to say that this was a significant differentiation from the previous sacrifices - enough so that this was to become known as the first Passover, for it was the first time during the Age of Aries that the Sun Passed Over the Equator at the Vernal Equinox after its last passing over the Equator for the last time in the Age of Taurus at the Autumn Equinox.

The Passover ritual represents a supposed dual purpose redemption-fertility ritual - the blood of one lamb be shed outright, and the second lamb be cast out unto the Earth, in order that through their deaths and suffering mankind can somehow atone for their previous trespasses (thus becoming "spiritually cleansed") and be spiritually regenerated ("fertilized") unto the Almighty... the new world rising from the fertile ashes of the old.

Judas and Jesus

The previous is likewise evidenced in Christian doctrine. In Christianity, one lamb (the Judas Lamb) represents the absolution from the sins of the past while the second lamb (the Jesus Lamb) represents innocence and the promise of future reward. The "Judas Lamb" - signifying the sins of the past - is "sent out into the wilderness" (after being thrown off a cliff to ensure it does not return) in order that it be consumed by the demon Azazel, whilst the "Jesus Lamb" is pierced and sacrificed in an act of salvational sacrifice. In Christianized Judaism, just as Jesus was considered the Lamb of God whom was pierced, Judas was thus be the Lamb of Azazel whose bones were broken.

Was Judas the impure aspect of Jesus?

Passover and Yom Kippur: Divine Balance

In Judaism, Passover is an extremely sacred, solemn ritual: almost as sacred and solemn as Yom Kippur. As such, it should be noted that both Passover and Yom Kippur take place roughly at the two Equinoxes. For it is at the Equinoxes that the Sun Passes Over the Equator on its annual transit to either the Tropic of Cancer or the Tropic of Capricorn. It is also on these two days that day and night are perfectly balanced at precisely twelve hours apiece - the significance of which will be expanded upon later.

To summarize, the significance of the two Passovers is that they are a time of the balancing of all elements, both natural and spiritual, as well as their interactions with one-another. Once the Sun passses over the equator in the spring, the days grow longer, signifying the victory of light over darkness. Once the Sun passes over the equator in the autumn, the days grow shorter, signifying the dying Sun and the victory of darness over light.

Hazy Shade of Winter

In the case of the Autumn Equinox, divine judgment is signified by the passage of the Sun into the House of Libra. The Autumn Equinox denotes judgment passed on the Elder Sun for the sins of man, after which the days grow shorter as the Sun allegorically begins dying its annual death again "for the sins of man", culimnating in its Winter Solstice death and simultaneous rebirth (resurrection)  as the Newborn Son. The judgment, tormeting, death and dead winter resurrection of the ultimately unconquered sun will be expanded upon later.

Passover was the midnight mass of the Jews - the sacrifice between the "two eves" - that is, between dusk and dawn, as both of these periods are literally times of evening (the evening of the day and night at dusk, and the evening of the night and the day at dawn). Thus, midnight is exactly midway between the two eves spoken of in ancient Jewish writing regarding Passover, as midnight is exactly six hours after dusk, and six hours before dawn. This is attested for in the fact that it was precisely at midnight that the Angel of Death passed over to kill the first-born sons of "Egypt".

The ancients viewed nighttime and the darkness that ensues from such as a time of ill fortune and evil, when evil (darkness) conquered (consumed) good (the Sun). Midnight marked the darkest depths of that darkness, and on the night of the Fall Equinox, the ancients, realizing that the Sun was at its midway point between dusk and dawn, marked it as a doubly ill portent. Midnight on the Autumn Equinox was viewed as a prelude to the comming anual death of the Sun.    

Just as the Sun of Man is judged and sentanced at the Autumn Equinox for the sins of man, likewise the Sons of Man are judged and sentanced at the Spring Equinox for the sins of man... on Earth as in the Heavens. However, the sentances passed down lasted three months' time, not three days. Three days refers to the generalized timeframe afforded to the actual Solstices and Equinoxes, whereas the actual timeframe of the sentances passed sown, was three months, beginning at the equinoxes and ending at the following solstices.

These sacrifices began with the immaculate conception of the new Sun / Son at the time of the Equinoxes and ended with the births of the New Sun / Son at the solstices. That is why Jesus is assimilated with a Winter Solstice birth (thus denoting a Spring Equinox immaculate conception), and why John the Baptist is assimilated with a Summer Solstice birth (thus denoting an Autumn Equinox immaculate conception) which in John's case, interestingly enough, coincided with the Archangel Gabriel passing judgment on his father Zechariah which lasted until the following Summer Solstice: the longest day of the year, also known as the day of the Sun in all its glory.

For the Sins of Man

That these sacrifices took place for the Sins of man is profound. Beyond the fact that the term Sin is phonetically similar to the terms Sun and Son, "sin" literally means "light", perhaps as in the "strange light" that Aaron's first two sons presented before the Ark of the Covenant which led to their deaths. In contrast, the concept of light being the destroyer of corruption weighs in with regards to Moses as well. Being learned in the priesthood of "Egypt", Moses certainly realized that the terms Pharaoh and Pharos are phonetically identical in speech as well as their ideal root meaning. The Pharaohs of ancient Egypt were considered to be bringers of light (wisdom) unto the darkness (ignorance and corruption). The purpose of Pharaohs was to destroy the forces of darkness, which is exactly the purpose of a pharos (lighthouse) - to bring light unto those who dwell in darkness. Note that the definition of Pharaoh is based up an idealism, while the definition of Pharos is based upon a utilitarian function.

Stepping back to the deaths of Aaron's sons, while their deaths may have been sin atonements made due to the passage of a comet, or perhaps due to a planetary corruption of the original spiritual syntax, it is more likely that they unwillingly were the first Passover Paschal Lambs. The Ark of the Covenant was most likely an Egyptian barque that was later carried off from a looted temple (barques existed in ancient Egypt for thousands of years prior to the Ark of the Covenant tradition), Aaron's sons may have been executed for attempting to loot the secrets of the Egyptian temple that housed it, or for making a claim of royalty which would have led for their arrests and executions. It is imporatant to note for future reference, that the Old Testament clearly states that the Jews spoiled Egypt just prior to the Exodus.

Most likely, Aaron's sons were murdered by or on behalf of the Priests of Ptah over a grieveous trespass, which led to a Hebrew revolt against the priesthood that resulted in the assassinations of the "firstborns" of "Egypt" at midnight on the Autumn Equinox, which timing marked the moment when the Sun was most vulnerable, and when the sin atonement was made for the evils that were unfolding. The terminology "Firstborns of Egypt" equates to "the children of the House of Ptah" and is a reference to Priestly caste of Princes and Princesses of Kemet.

The Autumn Equinox - the Original Mischief Night

It was not that the Angel of Death came forth to murder all of the eldest children of Egypt, but rather that a raid was conducted on the temple where the noble children of Kemet were sent to learn the wisdom of their royal, priestly elders. What happened in "Egypt" is simple to decipher: the Hebrews waited for midnight on the Spring Equinox knowing that the "firstborns of Egypt" would be in the temple all night chanting litanies until dawn, and at midnight they slaughtered them while their brethren simultaneously offered sin sacrfices on their behalf. The Hebrews literalized Kemetic allegory into a morbid twist in a bid to usurp the Kemetic throne which led to their banishment into the desert region beyond the Kemetic frontier. It's not that they were slaves in Egypt - it's that they held no power in the House of Ptah.

As a point of evidence, it can be noted that the  Passover meal was to take place "between the eves", which many midrashic authors have attempted to present as occuring between "Evening lesser" and "Evening Proper" ie, within a period of an hour or so. When it is realized that the terminology "between the eves" actually refers to the period between dusk and dawn (Hebrew days begin at dusk), such places the sin atonement sacrifice of the two lambs at and after dark, for with all of the elements required of the ceremony (five ritual baths, a myriad of clothes changing by the High Priest, the release of the Lamb of Azazel, etc), such could not have all taken place within a one hour period.

In Hebrew tradition, before the Lamb of God could be slaughtered, the Lamb of Azazel had to be taken out into the wilderness and thrown down a cliff with human relays watching in the darkness every so many feet for a signal from one another regarding the status of the lamb's fate. Such points to the fact that in the darkness of the Passover Equinox, Hebrews were outside offering sacrifice to the demon Azazel, which contrasts starkly with the claim that on the evening of the first Passover the Hebrews were in their homes by dark paying solemn tribute to their God. To further uphold this fact, it should be noted once again that the Hebrew days begin at dark: had a single Passover ceremony been delayed just one moment past the evening Sunset, the whole ritual would have been worthless and construed as an affront to the Hebrew God.

It should be noted that at the time of Jesus' and John the Baptist's births, a very similar occurance regarding first-borns is said to have taken place. It is said that Herod passed an edict regarding the slaughter of the firstborns of Israel. This should lead one to ask the question that if such an order were to be given, why would anyone who had or was a firstborn child stay in Israel? Why is their no historical account of a mass migration out of Israel due to that edict? If the government called for the death of my child, I would be planning to overthrow that government or I would be moving far, far away.

These Sins-Sons of Man spoken of here are a chapter in and of themselves which will likewise come later.

For the three months leading up to the Autumn Equinox, and the three months while the Sun lay dying, the planets in the night sky become more pronounced as the Sun retreats southward in the sky towards its womb-tomb at the Tropic of Capricorn. During this period, the days grow shorter as the nights grow longer.

The planets are the "first-born sons" in ancient writings. When at last the dawning of the Spring Equinox arrives, the planets cede realm back unto the Sun: that is, the Sun's light begins to consume them. In darkness, the planets are bright, feeding off of the light of the Sun. However it is the dawning of the new day  - and with the case of the Spring Equinox, the new year - that "destroys" the influence of the "strange light" of those nocturnal pretenders. It is thus worth mentioning that the light of the planets is not truly light at all, but rather the stolen light of the Sun being reflected off of them. The planets were sometimes considered pretender stars, wayward or wandering stars, fallen stars or fallen angels and were, due to their un-star-like behavior in the night sky, often viewed as malevolent-natured.

The First-Borns and the Priesthoods of Ancient Egypt and Israel

Noble firstborn sons were traditionally and typically given as "sacrifices" unto The Almighty. That is, first-borns were required to enter the priesthood in their youths, "under threat of (spiritual) death", perhaps to avoid any issues with them attempting to assume their father's crown before the alotted time. Likewise, the Spring sin offering of the ruler's only begotten Son was to match the Almighty's sin offering made the previous Autumn by the suffering and death of the Almighty's only-begotten Sun.

Just as the Sun resurrects after its "sacrificial death", likewise does the ruler's first-born son. When the time came for the son of the ruler to assume the father's noble station, he was to be allegorically sacrificed and reborn as the Son of the Holy Ghost (or in Kemetic tradition, the Osiris, which is their terminology used to define a former ruler) manifest on Earth. By giving the first-born sons over to the priesthood, the sacrifice is implied as being a sacrifice of the first-born Sons, and alternately, the first-born Sons (Moses, Jesus, John the Baptist, Sinhue) being "hidden" (with)in "Egypt" in order to avoid the edict regarding the "slaughter" of the first-born sons.

The term we use in ignorance today to define the Nile Delta nation, is not the traditional term used for that geographical location. The correct term is Kemet, whereas the literal definition of the term Egypt is actually "House (Temple) of Ptah", which became assimilated with the land of Kemet, but which can also be used to define the priesthood of Kemet, not the actual land of Kemet. This is no different that the errant application of the terms "House of Bread" (Bethlehem) and "House of Anu" (Bethany) to literal geographic locations in the Levant during the time of Jesus and John. Bethlehem is Virgo, the House of Bread, and Bethany is the Kemetic city of On (Anu), which was called by the Greeks "Heliopolis", meaning "City of the Sun".

If one were to balk at the notion that the New Testament location of Bethany was in reality a reference to an Egyptian city where the Sun was worshipped, I would simply counter by asking "And in what book do you read of the story of Bethany?", after which their obvious response would be "The Holy Bible". Upon such a response, I would simply state "Yes, the Helio Biblios - the Book (Biblios) of the Sun (Helios)". But as will be made apparent, Heliopolis (On) was more than merely known as the House of On: it was nothing less than the birthplace of the Messiahs.

As for the House of Bread, The reason why Virgo is referred to as the House of  Bread (Bethlehem) is quite apparent. The star she holds in her hand is known as Spica, the Kernel of Wheat from which Bread is made. In imagery she is depicted as holding a sheath of wheat. This was a reference to the fact that as the Sun enters Virgo, the wheat harvests begun in ancient Egypt. Note that once again: the Sun of God enters Virgo (the Maiden) at the beginning of the wheat harvest, the best kernels of wheat being reserved as the seeds of the next growing cycle to come.

Bethlehem and Virgo also correspond with the term Bethany in that On (Heliopolis) was, long before the Old Testament Exodus, called the City of the Multiplying of Bread, which itself translates to Bethlehem - the "House of Bread", where the wheat seeds were either threshed to make bread, or kept for the next year's growth cycle. Thus, both Bethlehem and Bethany are references to Heliopolis, the City of the Sun traditionally known as the City of the Most High (Anu). Once it is realized that Jesus was actually born in the "Egyptian" city referred to as the House of Bread, the act of his being taking into "hiding in Egypt" becomes far-more apparent as a reference to him being hidden within the Priesthood of the House of Ptah.

In the story of Moses' birth, the place where he was born is not overtly mentioned, however, the act of him being born in the sign of Virgo fits, as at the feet of Virgo sets the Well of the Abyss, leading down into the lower realms. It was Virgo whom gave birth to Moses in her House (the House of Bread: Beth-leHem) before "setting him" within the well to sail upon the "Celestial Nile" (the Milky Way) in order that he "come ashore" in "Egypt", thus avoiding being devoured by the Celestial Serpent Herut (Hydra) that prowls throughout the abyss located paralel to (app. 20 degrees above) the Milky Way. Simply stated, Moses was born in Heliopolis, and was hidden away within "Egypt" - that is, the Priesthood of Ptah. Likewise, it was the "Manna" of On that sustained Moses and his followers during their "Exodus" out of "Slavery" in "Egypt". On Earth as in Heaven.

According to the ancient Egyptian sphinx, the first house of the Zodiac is Virgo, not Aries as in the modern Zodiac.

"Everything begins with Virgo bringing forth the son of God. In Virgo, Libra, Scorpio and Sagittarius we see the first advent of Christ, His death, burial and resurrection, His battle against Satan." - J.R. Church (1053)

In ancient Egypt, Virgo was the first house (sign) of the Zodiacs. In the following rubbing from the Dendera Zodiac, Virgo-Isis is shown to the right holding a sheath of wheat in her hands (alternately she is shown holding a branch in her right hand and a sheath of wheat in her left) representing the sacred seed of the light of the world.  The sheath represents by the Alpha Star of Virgo - Spica, which is referred to in Jeremiah 23:5 as the branch or offspring of God the Father. In the spring the seed is scattered upon the earth, and at the fall harvest the seed is gathered back to the Father. The multi-headed Serpent at her feet represents the constellation Hydra, alternately known as Seth or Herut. The Lion represents both the zodiac Leo as well as one of the Akeru Lions. In Judaism, Leo is the symbol of the house of Judah.

Jeremiah 23:5 "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth."

In the above, which predates the Semites' arrival in the Levant and Egypt, Isis-Virgo is literally raising a righteous branch unto Leo.

Virgo was titled "Maiden of the Abyss", and was often portayed as standing over a well. This correlates with the Well of Souls in the Great Temple, as well as the Lake of Fire of pre-Semitic Egyptian tradition.

In the following hieroglyph, Virgo-Isis is represented by both the head and the primoridal mound (the Axis Mundi) which symbolizes her womb. The singular lion of Leo is here replaced by two Akeru Guardians. The multi-headed serpent Hydra is likewise present, as is the Well of Souls in the form of the red and blue waves of the Lake of Fire to the lower right. In place of Spica however, and between the Akeru, the deity Seker is here shown in the womb of Isis-Virgo... in the earth (Jeremiah 23:5).

In Hebrew, the term Zeker has several definitions, one of which being "records". In pre-Semitic Egyptian tradition, the deity Seker is the regent of an area known as the Hall of Seker, which is likewise known in Egyptian as the Hall of Records. Thus the usage of the term Zeker in Hebrew as a reference to records. 

Virgo in turn also plays a part in Libra, which not only holds the scales of judgment and justice (Jeremiah 23:5), but likewise by definition (liber) also is a reference to books, as in a library of records. In Judaeo-Christianity, the Hall of Records is synonymous with the Holy of Holies which houses the Foundation Stone, in Islam al-Sakhrah, and is where Zechariah, while making his fire offerings, was met by the Archangel Gabriel and was told of the impending immaculate conception of John the Baptist.

It is believed that the ancients held Virgo-Isis (Mut) as being androgynous. "...in ancient times...only ten [signs of the Zodiac] were known to the profane; the initiates, however, knew them all, from the time of the separation of mankind into sexes, whence arose the separation of Virgo-Scorpio into two; which owning to a secret sign added and the Libra invented by the Greeks, instead of the secret name which was not given, made 12... The Adam of the first chapter is the spiritual, therefore pure androgyne, Adam-Kadmon. When woman issues from the left rib of the second Adam (of dust), the pure Virgo is separated, and falling 'into generation,' or the downward cycle, becomes Scorpio emblem of sin and matter." (209:502ff)

And so we originally had Virgo being what we now identify as Virgo, Libra and Scorpio, flanked by two lions (Leo and Sagittarius)? Libra was designed to balance out Virgo and Scorpio (stomp the head and bite the heel).

"Virgo was drawn in the Egyptian zodiac and was said to represent the goddess Isis. To the Romans she was Astrea, the goddess of Justice, holding the Scales of Libra in her hand.  Astrea, sickened by the wars of men, was the last of the celestial beings to leave the earth for the heavens, hence she is sometimes depicted with the wings that she used to ascend to the stars." - 920

Virgo was originally androgynous, and was regent over both the House of Virgo and the House of Libra, later to be separated into two Houses (Female and Male). With Leo as the Judah lion or first Akeru, the second Akeru would be...

Virgo-Libra-Scorpio and Hydra: the Beasts of Revelations... the crowns/heads/horns symbolizing stars in each constellation, just as jesus' "crown of thorns" (t-horns) was the planets of his (the solar) system. Planets as failed/dead/false stars.

Seker has a "well" - the Lake of Fire. Seker also stands upon serpents, perhaps an allusion to Ophiuchus who chronologically comes about as the victor over Herut, thereby heralding in the Newborn Sun (Virgo-birth, Libra-justice, Scorpio-threat, Sagittarius-counter-attack, Ophiuchus-victory, Capricorn-Horn of Peace). Seker represents the fifth hour of the Duat - just before the resurrection of Osiris, which is likewise symbolized by Ophiuchus, who represents the night sky leading up to the Winter Solstice resurrection of the (Father as) the Sun.

Abraham and Sarah and Hagar; Seker and Sekhmet and Hathor; Lilith and Enki and Inana

Isaac and Ishmael: Jesus and Judas?

Medieval / Middle Ages - 5th-15th centuries, literally "Middle of the Age" or "Between two Ages" - Between two Eves. Mediterranean - Middle Earth.

Benjamin - Raven as Wolves, or Raven a Wolf?

According to Exodus, Moses had just led the very people out of "slavery" in "Egypt", whose deaths he was calling for not long thereafter. What a seemingly cruel and ironic turn of events? Not really. The allegory of the Baal worshpippers exposes a much more profound literal realization. By the end of the Age of Taurus, Baal (the Heaveny Bull) had come to symbolize all that was wrong with that previous Age of "Slavery" in "Egypt" - that is, Baal became assimilated with the sedient, corrupt Kemetic politicians and priests whom had perfected their game and refused to rescind their corrupt stranglehold on the masses as the Age of Taurus came to a close. It was Moses' role to end that stranglehold and to execute divine judgment on not only the corrupt rulers and priests in Egypt, but also the corrupt pretenders in his midst during the Exodus. 

It was not that the Jews were the only "slaves" in "Egypt", but rather that the overt Kemetic priesthood and rulership had come to symbolize all that was wrong with that previous age under which they had ruled. Life itself illustrates that the corrupt resist change because they are comfortable with the fleeting, temporal rewards of their corruption, whilst the masses carry the burden of that corruption. The corruption of the elitists in any society equates to slavery of that society's common masses because it is the masses that ultimately pay the price for the sins of the elite.

It is easily realized that the corrupt in any social system will always resist change whilst the oppressed look forward to change. A new age epitomizes the change which the afflicted long for, yet which the power elite resist. Such corruption and resistence is what led to the downfall of Kemet in the waning days of the Age of Taurus - and which also led to the Destruction of the Second Temple and the Diaspora of the Jews at the end of the Age of Aries.

At the beginning of the Age of Aries, many of the Jews were still steadfast in their worship of the House of the previous Age (the House of Taurus: Baal) - a serious affront to the then new Age of that time (the House of Aries) that Moses was attempting to herald in. Moses personified the destruction of the sins of the past (the previous age) while Aaron signified the heralding in of the future (the new age). In this aspect, they are precisely echoed by the Piscean rendition afforded to John the Baptist and Jesus: John preached repentenance of past sins while Jesus preached of the kingdom to come: Moses passed the priesthood on to Aaron and his sons, just as John the Baptist passed his disciples on to Jesus, and so-forth.

Those whom Moses ordered slain had revealed their true mindset through their act of defiance: they did not want to do away with the corrupt system that "enslaved" them in Egypt - they just wanted a more beneficial station within their own version of such. They were no less corrupt than the system that enslaved them: they were slaves of their own avaricious minds. Moses was against the corrupt system, whereas the Baal worshippers were against their unfortunate placement within that system.

The transition from the Age of Taurus into the Age of Aries is reflected in many hero myths of that pivotal time. The Sumerian Heavenly Bull in the Epic of Gilgamesh notates the apex of the Age of Taurus. As the Age began to wane, however, new traditions regarding Taurus emerged. Effigies to the Apis Bull in Egypt, for example, began to be replaced with effigies of Rams.

The Red Heifer in Judaism, which was instituted by Moses and of no true overtly logical purpose other than as a sign of interaction with the divine; Mithras slaying the Bull, and the Dionysian Harvest ceremonies in which bulls were ritually slaughtered are merely a few of many renditions of the transition from Taurus to Aires. During the Age of Taurus, many rulers were assimilated to the Bull: as the age of Taurus waned, however, rulers began to assimilate themselves as having dominance over that age, and its purpose became more of a sacrificial nature. This is because, just as the Sun is sacrificed yearly for the sins of man at the Autumn Equinox, likewise the Age from which the Sun is passing out of must be sacrificed for the sins committed during its reign. The previous Age must absolve itself, just as the Sun absolves itself annually through its wounding, dying and death.

The introduction of the slaughter of a sacrificial Paschal Lamb as the centerpiece of the Judaic Passover ritual denotes the transition into the new Age of the time, which in turn coincided with the destruction of the corrupt Kemetic establishment and the Exodus of a promised people unto a promised land to start anew wholly independent from the "slavery" (corruption) experienced in "Egypt".

Of course, even with the cases of Mithra and Dionysus being cited to build credence, many "orthodox" historians and Bible scholars would resist such the chronological syntax previously listed on the basis of the dating of the begining of the Age of Aries versus the "orthodox" dating of the "historical account" of Exodus. Yet those same experts cannot answer for why there was never any evidence of literal "slavery in Egypt" at the time that the Hebrews sojourned there. Likiewise, they cannot answer for why the Hebrews suddenly began calling themselves Jews. Nor can they answer for what the term Israel truly refers to. Nor can they accurately answer as to which God first gave the Jews the promised land. Nor can they account for why the ancient Egyptians carried their Supreme Deity into battle with them in a barque long before the Hebrews ever entered Egypt. Nor can they accurately answer as to why the Jews sacrifice two lambs at passover: one to YHWH, and one to the demon Azazel.

All of the above cases-in-point will be addressed in this book, as well as many more. There are so many assumed facts based on inaccurate translations of much earlier sources: my intent is not to vilify the later scribes, but rather to make known the true context of the earlier sources. Context and implication go hand-in-hand: as context is clairfied, the dynamics to which it applies dictates profound implications which must be properly addressed.

The way I view things is that if you have a compass that is one degree off, and you drive one mile, you will be in error by a few yards, which may or may not be critical. However, if you drive 5,000 miles with a compass that is one degree off, by the time you reach that 5,000th mile, you will be completely lost. Likewise, a small error can typically be corrected with little damage and a little effort within a short period of time, but when it comes to many inaccuracies over the course of a period spanning 5,000 years, one must re-evaluate their whole mental compass regarding pre-conceived assumptions, biases and prejudices. My goal is not to vilify - it is to reset the compass of the mind and to figure out where we took wrong turns in the past in order to safely bring us to our ultimate destination that we have been lured away from due to avarice, corruption and ignornace for centuries.

Flavius Josephus must be taken with a bit of skepticism, for his name reveals whom he was an agent of. Josephus was a scribe in the courts of the Flavians, who came to rule over the Roman Empire and whose dynasty lasted some 00000 years. As such, Josephus' objectivity regarding literal historicity is questionable.

There will be more on Exodus at a later time. For now I want to draw on the chronological syntax that led up the the 1st century AD.

Whilst Moses personified the destruction of the corruption of the previous Age of Taurus, Moses's brother Aaron was to symbolize the new Age of Aries. Aaron was referred to by the title of "The Anointed Priest (Moses: Messiah)" due to his being the first anointed High Priest of the Jews. Moses himself was anointed by The Almighty, who commanded that Moses commute his anointing to Aaron. Aaron was anointed with sacred oils (Chrism) per God's instruction (Exodus 40:13), a ritual that was passed down to Aaron's son Eleazar and his descendants since they were to preside perpetually over the High Priesthood.

Why would Moses cause an Exodus out of Egypt only to lead his followers into "40 years" of wandering in the desert? The answer is simple. Moses knew that he had to wait for the allotted time before entering the new land he was to turn into his nation, lest his gains be assimilated with the previous age. Nothing Moses did was by accident. The term "40 years" is not lliteral - the number forty was used by the Hebrew scribes to signify a long time (example, 40 days and 40 nights). The Jews wandered in the desert in order that they enter the Promised Land at the correct appointed time. The waning Age of Taurus and to be more precise, the final passing over of the Sun - that is, the final Autumn Equinox - ushered in the destruction of the Egyptian Empire - literally its FALL from God's favor into the depths of dead winter.

The period that the Jews wandered in the desert would have been 40 weeks, not 40 years. This can be proven with several reallizations. First, 40 weeks equates to exactly 10 lunar cycles, which is a very important factor in Hebrew numerology in that the number 10 is derived from the numbers 1 and 0 - the unity of male (1 which is phallic) and female (0 which symbolizes the omphallos, or womb).

Next, 40 weeks equates to nine Solar - Sothic Months, which is the amount of time it takes from conception to birth. Look at it from this aspect: 40 weeks / 10 Lunar cycles / nine solar-sothic months from the Autumn Equinox (the fall of Egypt, at which time the nation of Israel was conceived) would place Moses as the Father of a New Nation at the following Summer Solstice. If one was to count down the number of weeks from the Autumn Equinox (moment of conception) to the Summer Solstice (moment of Birth), one would arrive at 40 Solar-Sothic weeks. If one were to reverse the math and take 40 weeks from the number of weeks in a year (52), one would realize that there woould be 12 weeks left, which is exactly the amount of time from the Summer Solstice to the Autumn Equinox.

Next, it should be noted that Moses was very learned in the Egyptian Priesthood. This factors into the period of wandering in a very big way, because it was at the Summer Solstice that several profound events took place in ancient Egypt that are echoed in the creation of the nation of Israel. First of all, the Summer Solstice in Ancient Egypt marked the sudden beginning of the rainy season and the annual inundation of the Nile. This was in turn marked by the star Sirius rising heliacally with the Sun at dawn directly above the Great Pyramid.

The Great Pyramid symbolized Osiris's body lating in state within the womb of Nature in that it, along with the other two companion pyramids, on the Giza plateau were precisely coordinated in order to be a reflection of the three stars that make up Orion's Belt. In turn, Sirius was attributed to Isis ("Isis is the one alotted unto Sirius, for it is she who brings the rains"). The Summer Solstice marked the precise time of year when Isis lay above Osiris, which led to the renewed fertility of the land - i.e., the birth of Horus. This book, however, is not about comparative religion. It is in part about tracing the events that led to God shunning the corruption of Egypt in favor of creating a new covenant with Israel at the onset of the Age of Aries, and what subsequent implications that carries for mankind today.

The birth of Horus was an initiation ritual that the rulers of Egypt would have to thus go through in order to come forth from their "mother's womb" and their "father's decay" just as was anually written in the sky since ancient times in the Osirian myth. As such, prior to the Summer Solstice, the new ruler to be would be "shut away" to ascend the Great Pyramid from within while a pretend ruler took his father's temporarily vacant place upon the throne.

On the Summer Solstice proper as the clouds rolled in, Sirius rose helically with the Sun and while thunder clapped in the distance, the new ruler would, after being anointed within the Great Pyramid and thus renewing the covenant, emerge at the summit of the Great Pyramid (from his mother's womb and his father's decay), radiating like the Sun atop the Great Pyramid which at that time was finished in a glossy plating in order to reflect the rays of the Sun. The clouds and thunder were seen as affirmation to the masses that he was in fact communing with the Almighty.

Once the new ruler descended back to the surface of the Earth, he would then share the commandments with the masses after "avenging his father's death" - that is, after removing and pronouncing judgment on the pretend king and his corrupt court (symbolized in the Old testament as the Baal Worshippers). The Egyptian Book of the Coming Forth by Day - which would have been available to Moses as he was of royal blood and priestly caste - put it quite bluntly in stating that "Thy Sun Horus hath burst forth from his mother's womb and his father's decay, to avenge his father's death and to bring mercy unto the Earth during the Season of the Storm".

In the time of Moses, however, some distinct differences had taken place. By moses' time the rulership of Egypt had become extremely corrupt - not unlike Judea at the time of Christ. Further, the Age of Taurus was coming to an end (not unlike the Age of Aries at the time of Jesus). The masses had turned their backs from the Almighty, and as a result, with the exclusion of two chosen leaders (Moses and Aaron) and their followers, the Almighty had turned his back on the Egyptians - not unlike he had done to Israel at the time leading up to and including Jesus and John and their followers. Another "coincidence" is that the elder brother Moses had turned the priesthood over to Aaron and his descendants - not unlike the elder John turning his fellowship over to Jesus and his "descendants". This is why Herod took it as such a threat to his rule, that he ordered the first-borns of Israel to be slaughtered, just as the negative aspect of God had ordered regarding the first-born sons of Egypt at the time of Moses and Aaron.

Jews take the name of the Almighty with great reverence. While many Christians and Jews take the term Jahveh/JHWH/Jehova as being the literal name of the Almighty, such is not the case. All those terms are, is descriptive epithets for the almighty. So what is the name of the Almighty? It is a hidden name of great antiquity.

Imagine for a moment, if your name was Mary and people kept calling you Mora - would that offend you? To forget how to pronounce the name of the Almighty is tantamount to stating that he is of no significance. Going back to ancient Egypt at the time of the Exodus, a viewing of Cecil B DeMille's movie on this topic may be of some service to the reader. After the firstborns of Egypt were struck down, Pharaoh took his dead child and placed him before a statue of a certain deity and requested "Sokar, bring my child back to life" to no avail.

Rewind to when Moses ascended the Holy Mount and laid witness to the burning bush prior to the exodus, and one will find the Almighty define to Moses his very nature. Exodus 3:15  reads: ""And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.

Fast-forward about 40 weeks, and you would find yourself witnessing Moses atop the Sacred Mount communing with the Almighty.

Psalms 102:12 - “But thou, O LORD, shalt endure for ever; and thy remembrance unto all generations.”

Memorial Hebrew zikkaron meaning remembrance

Memory = Hebrew zeker meaning remembrance

All of the newborns of Egypt died precisely at midnight - exactly midway between two evenings

Inversion through, inversion within

delphic utterance

What was the burning bush? as the hieropglyph for Seker attests, It was a tau (later the Djed pillar) placed atop the Great Pyramid to be struck by lightning from the storms of the Solstice as yet another sign to those below that the ruler is communing with the Almighty. That is why there is no capstone on the Great Pyramid - nor has there even been: the capstone of the Great Pyramid is in Heaven. It is the burning bush that symbolizes Osiris' phallus - that is, more specifically, when it is lit ablaze by lightning, it symbolizes the Spirit of God descending like a dove in order to spontaneously conceive a new life within the womb of God: it signifies the fire baptism of which John speaks.

The name Aaron is based on two terms: Aaru and On - that is, Aries and Anu. Aaron also correlates with Orion, whom was "Beheaded" by the eliptic by the time the Age of Pisces began.

In ancient Egyptian mythology, the fields of Aaru are the coveted destination that all ancient Egyptians strived to reach. This was the ancient Egyptian version of paradise. Aaru was the Egyptian prototype of the later Greek Elysian Fields, which in turn are the basis for the later Christian Heaven.

On Earth as in Heaven

The ancient Egyptians created a version of Heaven on Earth  which they called Rosetau (now referred to as the Giza plateau). Rostau, Giza, was known as the "Highland of Aker," the "House of Seker" or "House of Osiris,", and was built to be a picture of the heavens on the earth. As such, it is no surprise that the pyramids of Rosetau correlates geographically with the costellation of Orion (Ori-On), which in turn reveals Aaru-On (Aaron).

Rosetau, in turn, breaks doen into two root words: Rose Tau (Rosey Cross), which when reversed becomes Tau Rose: Taurus - the Red Heifer.

Finally, the City of Anu (On), was called Heliopolis (Sun City: City of the Sun) by later Greek occupiers. Nonetheless, Anu was the universal term used for the Almighty Most High in ancient nations and empires throughout the Middle East.

King of the Jews

Jesus went to Lazarus upon John the Baptist's "beheading" (removal from the Course of Abia) in order to be coronated. This is why he waited even beyond the three days to get to him. Apparently Jesus thought Lazarus' death was allegorical, and as such he was awaiting the third and final day of the Equinox: the NT paints Lazarus' death as being literal. That is why after Jesus was anointed by Lazarus, he went to Jerusalem at the next Passover to avenge Herod's false priest's treatment of Lazarus - and why the Romans called him the "King of the Jews". Mary anointed Jesus, and then Lazarus coronated him.

Two Zechariahs and Two Restoration Periods

The OT Zechariah was a prophet at the time of the rebuilding of the Temple (commonly referred to as the Second Temple Period). The NT Zechariah was a High Priest at the birth of the New Age, John and Jesus.

At Evening time,...

Zechariah 14:7: "But it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.” Note that Zechariah is not speaking about the hours of dusk, but is making a revelation regarding a new dawn... perhaps a dawn that takes place at the exact moment of dusk, but in common sense, he is referring not to the dusk period between day and night, but rather to the dawn period between night and day.

Zechariah was speaking of the end of Aries and the beginning of Pisces?

Evening... means "the act of making opposites balanced". Levening (based on the term evening) means to make something rise. Dawn is the evening of night and day, just as dusk is the evening of day and night. Two evenings.

Thus, based on the reallization that the root of evening (Eve) denotes neutrality or balance, when an L is added to the beginning of such, the term become Leve (to elevate) - implying a positive essence, whereas if an L is added to the end (EveL), the term takes on a sinister essence.

Unlevened bread...

Crucified between two Eves?

Libra is a symbol of balance: the autumn equinox; and the evening of the year.

Enter Pisces

By the time of the births of John the Baptist and Jesus, the Rome-appointed high priests of the Jews were not the traditional High Priests of the Aaronite lineage, but were instead political appointees from non-messianic families. With the previous Age of Aries ending and the Age of Pisces at hand, the spiritually oppressed traditionalist Jews were anxiously awaiting the second coming of the messiah through the lineage of Aaron, knowing that unlike the corrupt, apostate "high priests" installed by Rome, the lineage of the Aaronite High Priests and their wives were verified as direct descendants of Aaron through Eleazar throughout the generations.

It is of no small significance that the term "Moses", meaning "anointed", is synonymous with the term "Messiah", a term used in reference to the second coming of the King of the Jews and thus, in turn, assimilated with Jesus. "Messiah", in turn, is derived from the Egyptian term "Messeh", which likewise meant "Anointed". Interestingly enough, Jesus was anointed by Mary Magdalen, who was a High Priestess of the House of Aaron and thus considered one of the "Sisters of Lazarus".

During the period leading up to and including the life of Jesus and John the Baptist, Judea was and had been under Roman rule for some time, which did not set well with most Jews. During that time, many Jews had become apostates in hopes of procuring Roman-sanctioned wealth, security and/or political gain. Through such corruption, the Levant had fallen to the foreign governance of Rome, who in turn placed vassal puppets into political and religious positions in order to control the populace. Again, just as was previously the case in Egypt, the corruption of the governance and religion had enriched the corrupt while  simultaneously enslaving the masses.

It was during this time that the seemingly irreconciliable chasm that had been building up within the Judeao faith - that is, the traditional spirituality versus the political Roman-sanctioned religion - came to a breaking point.

The Two Equinoxes

John the Baptist was conceived at the Autumn Equinox immediately preceding the conception of Jesus. John's conception occured while his father Zechariah, an anointed Aaronite priest, was in the Great Temple presiding over the Course of Abia.

Although Catholicism does not typically speak well of women with regards to spiritual or noble distinction, the Catholic Church does admit that Elizabeth - the wife of Zechariah - was of royal blood, being, like her husband, descended from the High Priest Aaron. Elizabeth would have been considered extremely spiritually significant to traditional Jews, especially at the close of one Age and the beginning of another. As such, Zechariah's wife Elizabeth would have been present with him at the Temple during the Course of Abia when the Angel of the Almighty visited Zechariah - as well as when she conceived the Baptist.

Jesus was conceived at the Spring Equinox – exactly six months after John the Baptist was conceived. As such, due to the layout of the priesthood at that time, Zechariah or one of his kinsmen would have likewise been the Aaronite High Priest at the Temple when Jesus was conceived, as the priestly function denoted a one week period occurring every six months, the last one (marking John's conception) having been precisely six months prior to the Spring Equinox. It was during this Spring Equinox that Mary conceived, and that Mary went to stay with Elizabeth, who was likewise with child at that time.

Per Wikipedia, "King David assigned each of the 24 priestly clans to a weekly watch during which its members were responsible for maintaining the schedule of offerings at the Temple in Jerusalem, in accordance with 1Chronicles 24:3–5. Prior to that time, the priestly courses numbered a mere eight. This newly instated a cycle of priestly courses, or priestly divisions, which repeated itself roughly twice each year."  Of course, this was not the latter religious system that was set up between the Romans and the apostate Jews in order to subjugate the Levantine masses to Rome, but was rather the traditional spiritual High Priesthood set up through the covenant between the Almighty and Moses.

As Zechariah would have most-likely been the Aaronite High Priest who presided over the spring equinox prior to the conception of John, Zechariah's time in the Great Temple at the Autumn Equinox was one set to a tone of retrospect in reference to the year by then ¾ spent; the ending of the Age of Aries, and the sins amassed throughout those periods by mankind - a ceremony of solemness and mourning of the dying year, coinciding with the waning Age of Aries. It is no doubt that on top of such, the Jews of the Levant, having been burdened by the yoke of Rome for centuries by this time, were looking for the savior messiah to herald in the new age.

In contrast to the Autumn Equinox service, Zechariah's time as the head of the Temple at the spring equinox would have been denoted as a time of promise and hope in the virtuous future afforded to the rebirth of the new year, the new Age, and the reborn, virtuous world that spring and the Age of Pisces would have thus embodied. This would have been personified in the return of the messianic savior, who was to wash away the corruption and oppression of the corrupt Roman oppressors and their puppet apostate vassals.

As such, with Autumn being the season of solemn remembrance and repentenance, John, being conceived at the Autumn Equinox, was obliged to administer the Baptism of Repentenance - the washing away of the sins of the dying year and the waning Age, whereas Jesus, who was conceived at the Spring Equinox, thus brought with him the message of the promise of a virtuous new beginning and of future glory.

Context of the Priesthood

In Judaism, the title-word for a priest is Kohen. In the Judaic priesthood, the most commonly accepted age for admission into the priesthood and thus the title of Kohen was 30 years of age. It is significant to note that both John the Baptist and Jesus were murdered at the age of 30 years, in fact exactly 30 years from the dates of their conceptions (on their equinoxial conceptual birthdates). The New Testament affirms that in Jesus' case, he was crucified at the Spring Equinox - which would have been exactly 30 years from the time of his conception.

Thus, the symbology of Jesus as the Paschal Lamb of the first  Passover (Equinox) in the Age of Pisces, dying exactly 30 years after the day he was conceived, whereas Jesus signified the last Passover (Equinox) of the Age of Aries. The Age of Aries was marked by the first Jewish Passover in Egypt, at which time the Pharaoh's firstborn son was sacrificed, and was ended with the last Aries Passover in the Levant, at which time John the Baptist was "beheaded".

Pharaoh calls on Zeker: John calls on Zechariah.  

The basic chronlogy regarding the murders of John, Jesus and Lazarus are as follows: first, John was imprisoned (entombed) and beheaded; next, Lazarus was entombed and resurrected; finally, Jesus was crucified, entombed and then resurrected.

Time Passes Over

Passover is significant to the conext of Jesus' conception, birth, death and resurrection. Passover is an observance of the Spring Equinox, when the passage of the Sun directly overhead marks true midday, since the day and the night are each exactly twelve hours in length. But in a deeper context, Passover denotes not just one, but both times of the year when the Sun passes directly over the Earth at the equator, thus creating equal (Equi) periods of day and night (nox).

Passover symbolizes Father Sky impregnating Mother Earth, whom is perceived as barren in the Autumn, and virginous in the Spring. As such, we see the profoundness embodied in the statements that John the Baptist was immaculately conceived unto a barren mother Elizabeth at the Autumn Equinox, and that Jesus was immaculately conceived unto a virginal mother Mary at the Spring Equinox. Like their first-born sons, Elizabeth and Mary each embody two phases of the same entity. The physical characteristics of Elizabeth and Mary were personifications of the seasons which each of them embodied at the respective times of year in which they each immaculately conceived: the New Earth of Spring, and the Barren Earth of Autumn.

John and Lazarus

Procyon and Halcyon - Orion's Hunting Dogs

Lazarus: Equinox or Solstice? The dying father, or the other Son? 

Another profound realization, is the context behind a statement made by Jesus  to his disciples regarding the trip to Bethany in order to raise Lazarus. Jesus spoke of the day and night each being exactly twelve hours in length. This only happens at two times of the year: the Spring and Autumn Equinoxes. As such, Jesus' statement places the time of Lazarus' death and resurrection as occuring at the Equinox ìmmediately preceeding Jesus' own Equinox death and resurrection. In other words, the death and resurrection of Lazarus occured at the Autumn Equinox: more precisely, exactly 30 years after the Autumn Equinox immaculate conception of John the Baptist.

Could Lazarus have been John the Baptist? By Imperial Roman tradition, no - but the facts prove otherwise.

Being an Aaronite High Priest, John the Baptist's father was considered a Kohen. There is no age limit regarding how old a Kohen can be, but a Kohen can no longer serve once they became physically infirm. Zechariah, being advanced in years, was obviously aware of this fact, and as such he would have been concerned that at some point, the priestly Aaronite lineage would die out if no rightful heir was procreated.

A Kohen could be temporarily disqualified from performing their priestly duties based upon several factors. The most common of these disqualifications are ritual impurity, maritial defilements, physical blemishes or temporary infirmities. Again, these are temporary disqualifications that, once remedied, the Kohen is permitted to return to their normal priestly duties.

Again, in contrast to the apostate Rome-sanctioned priesthood in play at the time, Zechariah was not a mere Kohen. Zechariah was a Zadok priest of the lineage of Aaron through Eleazer. Eleazar was Aaron's son, whom Moses (Eleazar's uncle), in the company of Aaron, anointed and dressed in the garments of the High Priesthood. This act not only served as the initiation ceremony of Eleazar into the High Priesthood, but also as confirmation that all subsequent High Priests would be drawn from the offspring of Aaron's elder son Eleazer as opposed to Aaron's younger son Ithamar.

The Old testament goes into detail regarding the sanctioning of Eleazar's lineage as the perpetual High Priests by the Divine himself in Numbers 25:11-13: "Phineas the son of Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest ... Behold I give to him my covenant of peace, and will be his, and his progeny after him, (a) covenant of everlasting priesthood in turn of his zealousness for his God, and he atoned for the sons of Israel".

Accross the spiritual spectrum from the traditional (Messianic Aaronic) order, there rose a rival priesthood of apostates called the Sadducees, whom were installed and sanctioned by the Roman occupiers in a bid to spiritually and psychologically break the Jews into the Roman yoke. The Romans of the days of the New Testament, having a myriad of their own gods to choose from, had no real interest in the Jews' spiritual views: all Rome wanted, was to subjugate the Levant for its labor force and resources. To that end, Rome installed well-paid puppets into political and spiritual roles in order to govern the populace through fear and self-doubt in order to make them dependant on the empire for guidance and protection.

Regarding the Sadducees, the medieval Jewish philosopher Maimonides (Moses ben Maimon, aka Rambam), in his treatise to Pirkei Avot, refers to them as "Gonvei Da'at (thieves of knowledge)" of the greater Jewish nation and of intentionally negating the Chazalic interpretation of Torah (Torah Shebal Peh Rambam to Avoth, chap. 2). Likewise, in his Mishneh Torah treatise, Maimondes defines the Sadducees as "Harming Israel and causing the nation to stray from following God" (Hilchoth Avodah Zarah 10:2).

The true High Priesthood traced its lineage back to Aaron through Zadok. This divine order was usurped by the Hasmoneans in the 2nd century BC, at which time the High Priesthood became corrupted with the political appointments of men who had no lineal birthright to the priesthood, after which the act of anointings of and by such non-lineal pseudo priests was worthless.

By the time of Herod the Great, the true priesthood had become delegated to minor tasks while political appointees took over the title of "high priest" in their place. Herod himself appointed at least six of these apothetic "high priests", one of whom (Aristobulus) being only 17 years old. In previous Rabbinical tradition, the minimum age for acceptance into the outward (lower) priesthood was twenty, and alternately 30 years of age regarding the inner (High) priesthood (Numbers 4:3,30)).

In traditional Judaic tradition, the station of High priest was one held for life (provided the High Priest not fall into disrepair due to age): by the time of Herod, High Priests were seated and dethroned by the will of the Roman-centrist puppet government. As a result, the number of "high priests" was higher in the 60 years leading up to the destruction of the Seocnd Temple, than it was in all of the time from its traditional founding through Aaron right up to the captivity. 

The Mystery of Zechariah

According to the New testament, Zechariah "became lame and unable to speak" as a direct result of John's conception, which would have thus temporarily disqualified Zechariah from performing any priesthood capacities whatsoever. Interstingly enough, this "infirmity" ended when Zechariah wrote down the errant name of his son. In other words, in an apparent bid to disquallify the legitimacy of John the Baptist, Zechariah was extorted by being deemed ritually impure and thus unable to perform his priestly duties due to a disqualification that began at the time of John's conception, and ended at the time when John was named John as opposed to him being title-named Zechariah after his father. Obviously someone was very concerned with John's birthright, so much so that they had his father deemed ritually impure from the moment of John's conception, right up until his mis-naming.

According to the Roman New Testament, the reason for Zechariah's infirmity was his initial disbelief of Gabriel's anunciation, but such a justification for imperiling the spiritual well-being of the Levant is wanting when compared to the myriad of offences being simultaneously undertaken by Romans and their apostate vassals throughout the region. Why would the almighty Jewish God shut off his beloved in favor of his enemies? Obviously there was a treacherous power grab in play, and Zechariah's priestly status as well as his son's birthright were casualties of such treachery. To take the New Testament account of Zechariah's inability to speak and his lameness as truth, would be the same as allowing a group of neo-nazis write the official history as to why the Halocaust occured. the Roman scribes who fabricated much of the New Testament were as much biased in favor of Rome, as the first century Sadducees before them were.

Under the maligned law being administered by the apostate Sadducees at the time of Jesus' conception (six months into Elizabeth's pregnancy), Zechariah's afflictions would have placed him into a state known as tumah, or ritual impurity. As such, Zechariah would not have been afforded the title High Priest or allowed to administer his priestly course of duty at the Great Temple during that period. During that time he was likewise considered ritually cut off (beheaded) from his status as the intermediary between the Almighty and man, and was placed into a state known as tumah (defined as being ritually "entombed" and "cut off").

Further, Zechariah was most-likely unable to use the tutelary identifier Zechariah during this time as well, which may explain why in another key passage he was referred to by another title-name.

Most significantly, during Zechariah's period of tumah, any offspring conceived during that period come to be considered spiritually illegitimate. This fraudulent act of tumah being imposed upon Zechariah was undoubtedly a political bid to prevent the sanctification of his firstborn son whom we today refer to as John the Baptist. This was also an attempt by the Sadducees to illegitimize the conception and therefore the birthright of Jesus.

Zechariah's temporary status as being ritually impure brings up a deeper realization. When Mary went stay with Elizabeth in the sixth month of her pregnancy (during the Spring Equinox), Zechariah would not have been present at the Great Temple to administer the Course of Abia, but rather would have been at his house with Mary and Elizabeth - a fact that has been conveniently omitted for some reason by New Testament scribes in favor of the Joseph myth.

Mary was also of noble priestly blood through Aaron, and as a maiden who came to be with Elizabeth during her pregnancy, she would have fulfilled the role of lady of the house, likewise fulfilling the role of surrogate wife to Zechariah. It is implied that Mary conceived prior to reaching Zechariah's house, but the facts allude to otherwise. In proper syntax, it was the visit from Gabriel that provoked Mary to go to the house of Zechariah, at which time she "immaculately conceived" the Son of Man.

The New Testament attempts to distance Mary from Zechariah, yet it does not account for the fact that if Mary was betrothed to someone named Joseph, why is it that Zechariah is referred to as the Guardian of Mary?

Simply stated, Elizabeth was the wife of the High Priest Zechariah the Son of God, and Mary was the concubine of Zechariah-Lazarus (Seker-Osiris) the Son of Man, not unlike Abraham, Sarah and Hagar. This comes deeper into play later with regards to the Raising of Lazarus. Obviously when it became known that Elizabeth had conceived, Zechariah was usurped by the political caste of the false priesthood installed by Rome out of fear that the messianic prophecies would be fulfilled, which in turn would have led to rebellion against Roman oppression and could have very easily led to the overthrow of the pretend priesthood as well as Roman political dominance in the region for once and for all.

The word tumah is a Hebrew reference to a state of ritual impurity. Tumah is often defined as being "entombed; shut away", in reference to the subject in question being "closed off" from being able to receive divine spiritual guidance. This likewise factors in with the story of the Raising of Lazarus.

The Joseph Cover-Up

At this point, context needs to be luminated on the circumstances in play at the time of the writing, as well as the numerous editings and rewritings of the New Testament. The New Testament was pieced together at the beheadst of the Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th century AD in a bid to salvage a dying empire.

The creation of Joseph was as much a ploy as the claim that Zechariah was ritually impure not only at the time of his wife's pregnancy but also at the time of Mary's conception. These were ploys, fabricated because had Jesus' true father been known, it would have been revealed that due to Zechariah's supposed status at the time of Jesus' conception (six months into his nine month period of tumah), Jesus would have been considered illegitimate. Zechariah was the father of both Jesus and John - two first born sons, albeit born to two separate mothers.

In Apocryphal writings dated to the 2nd Century AD, Zechariah was said to have been murdered by Herod's soldiers for refusing to tell them where the infant John the Baptist was hidden. In the Protoevangelium of James, for example, Herod sent some of his guards to interrogate Zechariah while he was at the temple, in order to find out where John was hidden. Zechariah replied that he did not know, as he was incessantly preoccupied serving God in the Temple, at which time the guards threatened him with death. After Zechariah replied that he was not fearful of death, the soldiers murdered him in the Temple.

In an even later writing, this one dated to the late 4th century AD and written by Gregory of Nyssa, it is claimed that due to the fact that Zechariah knew Jesus  was conceived immaculately, he refused to deny Mary access to the area of the Temple reserved for virgins. In response to this, a crowd had amassed and became enraged, and ended up murdering Zechariah in front of the sacrificial altar.

But both of those two versions - each written at least 100 years after the birth of John and Jesus - are extremely lacking of historical fact. In reality, while the 4th century version denotes that Zechariah had once again assumed a priestly funtion after John's birth, it likewise seems to be a spin on the Old Testament parable regarding the prophet Zechariah who was murdered much earlier, likewise between the altar and the Temple (crucified between two thieves): the altar signifying the corrupt, worldly political body, and the temple by then embodying the apostate Roman-mandated pseudo-priesthood that had Zechariah fraudulently removed.

Another issue is that in the first versions (2nd c AD) regarding Zechariah's death, his murder is claimed to have occured while John was being hidden away and while Zechariah himself was praying in the Temple. In the second version, Mary is at Temple after Jesus was born, and it is apparent that Zechariah had the authority to tell attendees where they could and could not sit.

It should also be noted that according to the second version, Mary would have been a witness to Zechariah's murder. Yet the New Testament makes no mention of any legal action with regards to the trials of those involved in Zechariah's murder. Obviously both of these are fables fabricated in a bid to fill a void regarding a matter which carried huge implications (Zechariah was Mary's guardian), yet was for some reason intentionally omitted at the time the New testament events took place, yet which was significant enough to latter followers that the latter scribes found it neccessary to fabricate story lines in order to fill in an extremely profound void. Where there's a false alibi, logic follows that there must likewise be guilt by omission. Sometimes it's not what is said that proves guilt, but rather what is not - in this case, there are 400 years' worth of fables attempting to cover up a very profound mystery.

The fact that the 4th century version was written as a reconciliation of the OT prophet Zechariah with the NT Zechariah at a time when the earlier 2nd century version would have already been widely circulated, is indicative that people did not bellieve the 2nd century version, and as such, the 4th century scribe considered it imperative that the NT Zechariah be reconciled to the OT Zechariah.

The 2nd century scribes claimed the death of Zechariah took place while "Joseph", Mary, John and Elizabeth were in Egypt due to Herod's edict regarding the murder of  the First-Borns. While the latter scribes claim that Zechariah was murdered for not disclosing where John and Jesus were taken to, the reality is that Zechariah was

VERSION 1: ZECHARIAH TUMAH FOR LEAVING PRIESTHOOD TO GO TO EGYPT

removed from his priestly status for absconding himself from the corrupt priesthood in favor of traveling to Egypt at the head of the Holy Family.

Of course, Zechariah would have been ritually excommunicated (considered tumah: "entombed"), he would have lost his status as the Head of the Course of Abia ("Beheaded"), and he would have been represented as ashen and a shadow of his former self... thus, Joseph. The sudden departure of Zechariah from the priesthood would have raised alarms among the Romans and the false priesthood that had by then usurped the divine order. That in itself was probably what led to Herod creating the edict regarding the Slaughter of the First-Born Sons.

END VERSION 1

VERSION 2: ZECHARIAH TUMAH DURING JESUS' CONCEPTION

END VERSION 2

And most significantly, Zechariah would no longer be known by the title of Zechariah. < Enter Seker-Osiris >

Left Off

At an earlier point, Zechariah was beheaded (removed) from the priesthood, but John was not. At the time John was conceived, Zechariah was the high priest. At the time John was named, Zechariah was reinstated (coinciding with the third month of Mary's pregnancy). At the time Jesus was conceived, Zechariah was tumah. John's beheading was not literal: John as the lineal inherent of the Course of Abia, was removed of his priestly status by Herod (removed from the head of thre order of Abia: "beheaded"). herod had him removed in order to appease Salome who feared John's censure in the Temple. When Jesus realized this, he went to Lazarus for his blessing. Lazarus (the beheaded Zechariah - possibly even John the Baptist) was "raised from the dead" by Jesus in order to receive his (Lazarus's) blessing?

What religion did Muslims worship prior to Islam?

 The First Shall be the Last

The Age of Taurus (Baal) went out with a Zeker

The Age of Aries went out with a Zechariah.

Zechariah was late leaving the Temple at the time of John's conception. Was he waiting for someone.

Lazarus was late leaving the cave at his resurrection. He was waiting for someone.

Mary and Elizabeth were probably at the same place within the Temple when Gabriel appeared exactly 6 months apart;

Mary and Elizabeth were probably in the same place when they conceived;

During both conceptions, Zechariah was the High Priest of the Temple.

John the Baptist was born at the Summer Solstice – the Dog Days of Summer - at the helm of the rainy season, and thus he baptized with water

Jesus was born at the Winter Solstice – the Halcyon Days of Dead Winter, notating the resurrection of the sun, and thus categorized as the fire baptizer – the re-igniter of the fire of the sun.

Jesus was baptized in water by John at the Summer Solstice

John the Baptist was locked away and beheaded in August – but most likely this took place at the Autumn Equinox to coincide with his immaculate conception.

Lazarus was placed in the cave in December at the Winter Solstice

Lazarus was raised at the Vernal Equinox (“…twelve hours of daylight”)

Jesus was crucified and placed in the cave in March at the Vernal Equinox – the same time of year that he was previously conceived.

How can Jesus be crucified and resurrected at the same time that Lazarus was simultaneously raised from the dead by him? Ask Horus (John-Jesus), Seker-Osiris (Zechariah-Lazarus), El Isis Beth (Mary) or Nephthys (Martha). The resurrected Jesus was the New Son – the New Sun, whereas the resurrected Lazarus was reunited with Isis as Sirius, thereafter becoming the Holy Ghost.

Jesus and Lazarus were both going through a simultaneous transition at the Vernal Equinox… a transition from the Age of Aries to the Age of Pisces.

Anubis (John) became Jesus (Horus) while the previous Horus - Seker (Zechariah) became Osiris (Lazarus). The Holy Man becomes the New Son; the Old Son becomes the Holy Ghost (Ptah-Seker-Osiris: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost). This ensured continuity on Earth as in Heaven.

The Son "jumps off" of the Sun at the Autumn Equinox, and then "jumps back on" at the Spring Equinox so-as not to suffer the fate of the sun when it is dying and then dead.

09252019 Start 1:30A

Each Equinox and Solstice is marked by the transit of the Son from one House to another.

The Spring Equinox denotes the transit from Pisces (ruled by Jupiter) to Aries (ruled by Mars);

the Summer Solstice denotes the transit from Gemini (ruled by Mercury) to Cancer (ruled by the Moon);

the Autumn Equnox denotes the transit from Virgo (ruled by Mercury) to Libra (ruled by Venus);

the Winter Solstice denotes the transit from Sagittarius (ruled by Jupiter) to Capricorn (ruled by Saturn - also rules part of Aquarius).

Two Marys - Venus rules Taurus and Libra, and Virgo is ruled by Mercury and Ceres.

By symbolgy (the Ram), John the Baptist is assimilated to Aires (the previous Age: Ages turn in retrograde), and Jesus (Ichthys) the Fish (the then-New Age). The House of Aries is ruled by Mars. The detriment of Aries is Libra, which is ruled by Venus. As such, the period of September 23 to October 22 would be detrimental to John the Baptist-Mars, when a wayward woman (Venus-Salome) called for his beheading. It is at this time that the Sun likewise transits through Orion. All that can be seen of Orion at this time, however, is his head, as his body has transited below the eliptic. John shunned Venus-Salome for leaving her first husband in order to shack up with Herod. Venus-Salome is co-ruler of the House of Taurus, and then later in the year becomes the ruler of the House of Libra, at which time she demands Herod (Herut - Hydra) decapitate John. Herod passes judgment in the House of the Scales.

John the Baptist as Mars (Aries) rebukes Venus (Ruler of the House of Libra) for leaving Taurus for Libra.

Libra is symbolized by Herod (Hydra lives in the sky near Libra, and thus lives "in her House"), who judges John on behalf of Venus-Salome (the scales of Libra).

John-Mars becomes the head of Orion.

John-Mars also co-rules over the House of Scorpio, which immediately follows the House of Libra. This is alluded to in the Scorpion striking at the woman's heel and the woman striking the Scorpion's (Mars's) head.

Genesis 3:15, NLT: "And I will cause hostility between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring. He will strike your head, and you will strike his heel.'" This speaks of the Fall of Orion moreso than the Fall of Hydra. This is between Libra-Venus - Hydra and Scorpio-Mars in response to the beheading of John the Baptist. Something is amiss here

Genesis 3 is aptly named "The Fall". It is the Book of the Autumn. It speaks of the Serpent - Herod-Hydra, and how he came to cause turmoil on Earth and in the Heavens.

1  Now the serpent (Herod-Hydra) was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman (Salome-Venus) “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”   2  The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,   3  but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden (the Earth), and you must not touch it, or you will die.’ ”   4 “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.   5 “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”   6  When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. The Serpent (Herod) seduced the Woman (Virgo-Venus) She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.   7  Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.   8  Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden.   9  But the LORD God called to the man, “Where are you?”   10  He answered, “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.”   11  And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?”   12  The man said, “The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.”   13  Then the LORD God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”   14  So the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, “Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life.   15  And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”   16  To the woman he said, “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”   17  To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.   18  It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field.   19  By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.”   20  Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living.   21  The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.   22  And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”   23  So the LORD God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken.   24  After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

09252019 End 3:26A