Shape Shifting Into the Holy Grail
Shape Shifting is a common trick of disinformation artists. This is how it works and here are some examples in Acadian history:“Its usual strategy is to begin its work by adhering so closely to the letter of the truth as to be virtually indistinguishable to all but initiated awareness, installing itself through the rhythmic lull of entrainment so as to catch the “congregation” totally off guard when it finally diverges slightly or greatly from the set pattern and so pulls a portion of the truth along with it.”
As educators, we must be alert.
Regarding the story behind the Da Vinci Code, Holy Blood-Holy Grail, Henry St. Clair the Navigator and a bloodline of Jesus, mostly it traces back to a man who confessed, in a court of law in 1993, that it was all a lie.
“After asking Pierre Plantard de St. Clair to swear on Oath – Plantard de St. Clair admitted to the Judge that he lied about everything; whereupon St. Clair was given a serious warning and advised not to “play games” with the French Judicial System. “
The Judge’s search of Plantard’s house uncovered a hoard of Priory of Sion documents, claiming Plantard de St. Clair to be the “true King of France” – the Judge subsequently detained Plantard for a 48 hour questioning. This happened in September 1993 and it was all reported in the French Press.What Plantard is falsely claiming has some related facts attached to it.
Those who’ve been following this story will ask, “What about Poussin’s “The Shepherds of Arcadia” Why was this painting so important to King Louis XIV. Wasn’t there a tomb found that exactly matched the one in the painting?
The most likely pattern for the Priory of Sion to copy was the French Christian militia called The Compagnie du St.-Sacrament of the 17th century. It acted on behalf of the Guise-Lorraine families, was involved in the pro-Catholic Fronde and made up the core of the regular militia in early America. They are found also at Lake St. Sacrament, the site of the ‘Massacre’ at Fort William Henry in 18th century colonial America.
It was the goal of the Guise-Lorraine and the Guise-Hapsburg families to expand into new territory and increase the population in America. This was sponsored mainly by Antoinette de Pons, along with other Catholic ladies of the court and during a substantial period they sponsored settlements along with educational and religious facilities, hospitals and forts, transportation and everything practical that was needed by the settlers in the Louisiana Territory. They controlled the government in America from within the Catholic Church and its institutions. There was no other government. This was true Acadia in practice by the actual descendants of the Frankish Merovingians and their Indian allies in America.
Plantard and his cohorts continue to push a theory based on the possibility that Jesus Christ had descendents who intermarried with the royal Franks to become the Merovingian Dynasty. This part of the theory may be true. The Merovingians in fact, were the first kings to establish Christianity in the heart of Europe during the Roman Catholic and Byzantine eras and that group of surnames can be traced to the early Acadian American settlers who were Catholic and who are now also settled in Louisiana and beyond. Historians agree that the Merovingians traced their ancestry back to the Benjamites who had fled from Israel to Arcadia in Greece, and this makes perfect sense. Hellenes did consider themselves to be Hebrews. Scholars have long recognized that the Hellene legends coincide with the Old Testament legends.
This is where the falsehood enters in:
“Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair tried to link himself to King Dagobert II and the Merovingian dynasty.”
“The reconciliation between paganism and Christianity” they tell us was the basis for the Prieure de Sion. This is the dead give-away that they are Pirates, because a Christian cannot ‘reconcile’ with a pagan. In Catholic terms, the word Pagan refers to religions that include human sacrifice, cannibalism, and other such horrors. Therefore, the Prieure de Sion is busted for fraud right out the gate just for claiming such a thing.
Baigent, Leigh & Lincoln, authors of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, which is the basis for the DaVinci Code movie, write:
“The avowed and declared objective of the Prieure de Sion is the restoration of the Merovingian dynasty and bloodline – to the throne not only of France, but to the thrones of other European nations as well.”
Someone wants to rule the world, eh?
It might be true that the words “Holy Grail” are a mistranslation of early French words for “royal blood,” but their claim that the true purpose of Prieure de Sion is to protect alleged royal descendants of Jesus is bogus. What is more bogus is the preparation of the way for their accession to world power. This is not a Catholic doctrine, since Jesus never claimed that his power was of this world. The descendants of Jesus would logically be Catholic or Orthodox, but even if they aren’t, the whole idea that someone is pushing Holy Grail propaganda should be suspect.
God did not want us to have any King other than Jesus Christ, and this we learn from both the Old Testament and New. A confederation of city states, one for each tribe, equal but separate, was the original pattern given to the twelve patriarchs by their father Jacob, and this was the pattern for America. These city states should have as a central authority God alone and no other. The church provides us with all that we need of law making. This is the strict interpretation of the scripture and tradition, like it or not.
Whoever is promoting this Grail agenda is clearly not Catholic.
They also claim that Christ was a descendant of King David, even though Christ himself denied this. There is every logical, archeological and historical reason to conclude that King David never existed, and in fact even the Jewish Encyclopedia states that the name was the result of intended scribal errors and that it applies to another king of a different name.
This myth of bloodline descent from King David is an important part of the false agenda being promoted by books like ‘Holy Blood, Holy Grail’. This includes the myth of Prince Henry the Navigator, another alleged descendant of David. These descendants of David are Jews. Even members of the Jewish mafia brag about being in the tribe of David. They would never, ever allow a practicing Christian among their ranks, let alone a Catholic.
Am I the only person who finds it odd that Jews would claim to be the descendants of Jesus which would then give them the right to rule over the world?
They claim that Jesus had a legitimate claim to be “king of the Jews”. In fact, they are wrong in calling Jesus and his family Jews and this is a basic flaw in their agenda. Jesus was of the family of Zadok, or Zachariah, the High Priesthood descended from Aaron. He was not of the tribe of Judah.
The Jewish Encyclopedia entry for High Priest states, In the early Second Temple Period, the High Priest also acted as political head of the nation, recognized as such by the [Romans] who charged him with maintaining order and collecting and delivery of taxes. The office was in the hands of the Zadokite family until taken over by the Hasmoneans.” This was accomplished when the daughter of Herod married Simon the Hasmonean, who was not a Zadokite, according to Josephus. According to apochrypha, there was a murder of the Zachariah the High Priest Zachariah involved, which may be in addition to the murder of John the Baptist, after which “Appointments to the High Priesthood were made at the whim of Herod”.
Zadok is defined as a priest who is a descendant of Eleazar, son of Aaron (I Chron.5:34). This distinguishes the Zadokites as the only family qualified for the High Priesthood. When the Quran identifies the Virgin Mary as a sister of Aaron, this clarifies that Jesus is Zadokite, therefore in line for the High Priesthood when John was murdered by Herod.
The Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls: “The expression “Sons of Zadok” is found in Ezekial 40.46, 44.15, 48.11. In these passages, a monopoly of the priestly Temple service is claimed for the descendants of Zadok It is inferred from the biblical evidence that a priestly dynasty descendant from the priest Zadok, was high priest during the Persian Period. In the Damascus Document, Ezekial calls them “elect of Israel, those called by name, who shall arise at the end of days.” We are then told that “Connection with the usurped Jerusalem priesthood is plausible”. The characters for Zadok are TSDQ.
- Since the High Priest served in place of a King in Judea, Jesus could then be called King of the Israelites, not Jews. The false claim is that he was “descended from the royal house of the Israelite King David”. One problem is that David was not an Israelite, nor was he the ancestor of Jesus. Jesus himself denied David in the New Testament of course because the Jewish Encyclopedia under the entry for ‘Names of God’ states clearly that David was a name invented out of the word for God, by turning the letters upside down. Therefore, the correct scriptural translation should be that Jesus would sit on the throne of God, not on the throne of David.
- They claim that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and had at least one child by her. If he did, it’s not an anti-Catholic belief and no one would be surprised at all by it. If they did have a child, the number of their descendants could amount to entire nations, and I doubt that any of their descendants would see any logic in having a Jewish monarch today.
- The promoters of this idea believe that Jesus and his sympathizers staged his Crucifixion and Resurrection and that he survived into old age. This is not a heresy and it corresponds with other texts which claim the same thing. The only way to explain why Jesus’ fame spread, what inspired people to create walled cities for Christians, or the many attested miracles that He and the Saints have performed is through his survival into old age. He simply changed identities, laying down his life and taking up another, by the authority of his father. This is how he survived to old age.
- Part of the promoted idea is that Mary Magdalene and her offspring went to southern France. In fact, there is plenty of evidence that they went to Wales, not Southern France. Jesus used to go to a little town called Purdy, they tell us. There is a very interesting documentary on it which I have previously posted. Just so happens that who was in the South of France at that time were the Pirate Phrygians, a well recorded fact, and this is what the whole story is working around to. It’s becoming clear that they want to claim descent from Jesus and Mary Magdalene, and from that fiction, to rule the world.
- The Sionists promote the idea that Jesus’ bloodline mixed with that of the Franks and started the Merovingian dynasty of the early Middle Ages. This could well be true.
They claim that the Merovingian line extends into the modern “noble” houses of Europe, so Jesus’ descendants are alive today. Legitimate Catholic monarchy was outlawed when Europe became Protestant, thus there are no more ‘Noble Houses’ in Europe. Their thrones, titles, lands, and authority have all been stolen by Pirates. Yes, descendants of Jesus could possibly be alive today, but even so, claiming to be a descendant of Jesus from an illegitimate bloodline that has stolen Catholic Church property and tried to genocide Catholics in world wars is not enough to prove the right to be king, or to even claim that right. The fact is that the word ‘noble’ is a Catholic word that refers to Catholic people who follow Catholic law and it does not include illegitimate descendants of monarchs born out of adulterous unions.
- They claim that this ‘holy grail’ propaganda creates contentions that erode the hegemony of the Catholic Church. Yes, that’s exactly what they want to happen. They are Sionists of the Priory, pagan and anti-Christian. Happily, Catholicism does not justify itself with numbers of adherents. It justifies itself by being the true religion established by Jesus. It’s all a test, baby.
Investigators tell us that starting in 1958 there was a voluminous output of propaganda promoting the idea that Jesus is a Jew and is a descendant of David and has descendants who have the right to claim Kingship over Jerusalem and the world.
Why is this agenda being pushed? Who benefits?
“One of the tactics of liars is to find a means of subtly allying their message with that of the truth so as to generate confusion in untrained minds which would tend on surface evidence to accept these actually contrary messages as equivalent.”
Looking at exactly how they falsify history, it becomes clear that the pirates are inserting themselves falsely into medieval history.
They claim that Godfroi de Bouillon ‘won’ Jerusalem, when this is patently false. Notice how this false construct sounds exactly like the story of King David. Their literature puts it:
“One might therefore term Godfroi de Bouillon as a sort of ’king of kings’, or at least a maker of kings, since he founded the Order of Sion that could crown Kings of Jerusalem.”
“To the south of Jerusalem looms the ’high hill’ of Mount Sion.” By 1099 an abbey had been built on the ruins of an old Byzantine basilica at the express command of Godfroi de Buoillon. “According to one chronicler, writing in 1172, it was extremely well fortified, with its own walls, towers and battlements. And this structure was called the Abbey of Notre Dame du Mont de Sion.”
The truth is that 1099 A.D. was the height of Byzantine power, there would not have been any ‘ruins of an old’ Byzantine basilica, though there would have been a brand new Basilica. This was the mighty Roman Catholic Empire when it was united with the East. Not only was it united with the East, some of its major cities were Damascus and Antioch. Bouillion did not capture Jerusalem, because it was already a Byzantine Christian possession. It was under the control of the Christian dynasty related to William the Conqueror. This section of the Christian empire can be found on old maps and extends to North Africa and Yemen. The so-called Muslims at that time were nothing more than pirates, slave raiders and highway robbers who had to be put down. The name Boullion is, however, very much like that of the ‘last’ Phrygian king Bulan, and Anne Bolyn, and could even be pronounced like Bigot the scandalous early American fraudster. This Phrygian name always shows up in anti-Christian false history.