From the Begining
The Beginning
Zechariah
Zechariah
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
John the Baptist
John the Baptist
 Back Home

The Scenario

John the Baptist and Jesus the Christ are two aspects of one and the same entity - ''John Zechariah''. The one entity was dissected into two aspects by the Roman Flavians in order to terminate John Zechariah's true significance into a false Christian doctrine in order to usurp Judaism into a Roman controlled religion for the masses and to immortalize the Flavians through religio-political propaganda. An individual entity exclusively known as Jesus the Christ never existed in and of itself until the closing decades of the first century when Roman propagandists began modifying Judaic traditions in order to make them coincide with Flavian exploits and ambitions. 

Members of many if not all ancient cultures believed that their immortality depended on their being remembered - even if by another name. Several examples of the significance of being remembered in ancient times can be seen in the act of people taking on new title-names as their status changed, typically done in order to erase the memory of their former selves or to accentuate their new status. Other examples include the process of mummification, the act of bringing gifts, tribute and/or food and drink to the graves of the deceased, ancestral worship and the elaborate resting places of rulers.

In contrast, the significance of one being remembered is revealed in the act of Damnatio memoriae - that is, the condemning to oblivion of the memory of rivals, tyrants and ''heretics'', an act that was commonplace throughout antiquity. Such was the fate of the heretic Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten, who ruled in the 14th century BC, as well as the last Roman Flavian ruler Domitian, who ruled from 81-96 AD as a paranoid tyrant who was obsessed with memorializing and deifying his father Vespasian and his brother Titus as formerly living deities.

  • The Sumerian term for Baptist (Sakhar1) and the root Greek term from which Jesus Christ is derived (IUSA KRST2) mean the same as both are in turn derived from the same terminology - the IU and ST on the latter being superfluous Hellenized additions to the Egyptian SA KR root.
  • The Bible notates that Jesus is a baptizer, again leading one back to the Sumerian term for Baptist (Sakhar), and through this leading back to the father of John the Baptist - Zechariah, whose title-name is phonetically akin to Sakhar.
  • John's father's title name is Zechariah (Zeker-Iah), the root of which is etymologically akin to IUSA KRST - the Greek term through which, as previously mentioned, Jesus Christ is derived (the Gospels were originally written in Greek, and as such, the Greek IU prefix - "Éver Manifesting" - and the Greek suffix ST - "One who performs a specific action" - were carried over into the title Jesus Christ). To also support this, the Seker aspect of the Egyptian triune deity Ptah-Seker-Osiris denotes the Zagreus aspect of Dionysus: Ptah is the Father aspect, assimilated with Zeus and Jupiter (note the Piter in Jupiter: Zeus Pater: IU Ptah - the "ever-coming Father"), and Osiris is the Holy Ghost aspect from which Dionysus (the ''second-born Zagreus'') is derived. This would make Zagreus (Zechariah) the first-born son of the ever-coming Ptah.
  • The drama regarding the naming of John reveals that John was to be named such for a specific purpose - most likely in hopes that he would be remembered in the same context as the historical hero Jonathan of the Hasmonean Dynasty that had then recently come to pass due to occupation by the Romans and betrayal by the Syrians. This name drama likewise revealed the ignorance of the Jews at the time of John's birth, in that they did not realize that John was to become a baptizer, in that the term Zechariah was not merely a name but actually a title meaning ''Baptist Lord''.
  • Zechariah and Joseph were never seen together. Zechariah raised Mary, just as he raised Elizabeth. In fact, Elizabeth (Lady Isis of the House) and Mary (from the Egyptian term Meri - ''Beloved'' - that was used as an epithet for Isis) are two aspects of one and the same entity - the ''sister-wife'' of Osiris, Joseph being synonymous with Seth - the wife of Nepthys but not the father of her son: Osiris (Zechariah) was the father of Anubis (John) who would later become Horus (Seker): Socharis - IUSA KRST - Jesus Christ - Zechariah
  • As Zechariah's wife, Elizabeth would have left her home a virgin and moved in with Zechariah in her youth.
  • John was the first-born aspect - just as Zagreus (Zechariah) was to Dionysus, and "Jesus" was the second-born (Jesus Christ = IUSA KRST = again, IU Zechar Iah) - just as Dionysus (Osiris: Bacchus) was to Zagreus.
  • Leonardo DaVinci painted many works of John the Baptist, one being a painting of John the Baptist as Dionysus/Osiris, which he called by the Roman equivalent "Bacchus", in which John is shown as having realm over both Baptisms (Fire denoted by the raised finger pointing upwards, and water denoted by the lowered finger pointing downward).
  • In other paintings, John is shown as making what is called "the John Gesture", that is, holding the pointer finger on his right hand upward. Some authors have stated that this means "Remember John", apparently ignorant (or perhaps not) of the fact that in Hebrew, the word for "remember" is "Zeker", which is the root of John's father's title-name. John's gesture signifies his being ''born first'' and thus him being the first-born Dionysus (Zagreus), whereas Jesus is often shown pointing his pointer and middle fingers, symbolizing his have been ''second-born''.
  • John was born on the summer solstice, and Jesus was born at the winter solstice. This indicates that John was conceived at the Autumn equinox, which notated the beginning of the Jewish year, and that Jesus was conceived at the mid-point of the Jewish year. True birth begins at conception, when the soul is berthed - tethered - into a vessel of mortal flesh. The act of coming forth from the berth canal only signifies the transit from a watery embodiment into an environment comprised of matter, both matter and water being the lower elements and thus symbolic of the lower or human nature, whereas the true berthing takes place at conception when the soul through the spirit (comprised of fire and air - the higher elements) finds its way into a matriarchal host in order to initiate its ability to experience manifestation. 

1 Sakhar: The Phoenician Origin of Britons, Scots and Anglo-Saxons by Lawrence Austine Waddell, Chapter 19 - Bel Fire and John the Baptist's Day: 

"His (John's) initiatory rite of Baptism is wholly unknown in Judaism, whereas it is a part of the ancient ritual of the Sumerian and Aryan Vedic and Eddie Gothic Sun-cult, wherein Baptism is called by the Goths Skiri (or "The Scouring") which is radically identical with the name "Sakhar" applied to it by the Sumerians. {Sakhar (Br. 5082, and Sakar (Br. 4339). The founder of the 1st Sumer dynasty about 3100 B.C., who uses the Swastika and figures himself as a Fire-priest, often records his presentation of a "Font-pan" or "Font of the Abyss" (Abzu-banda) to different temples which he erected (Thureau-Dangin Les Inscript. Sumer, 17, etc.) Sargon I. about 2800 B.C., as high-priest who uses the Swastika, describes himself as "water-libator" and devotee Nu-iz-sir (="Nazir") of God--"the Sakhar (or Baptist) Lord" (C.I.W.A., 3, Vol. 4, No. 7).

And John-the-Baptist was also a "Nazir" or consecrated devotee (Luke i. 15, and cp. Numbers vi, 2 f.).} And John-the-Baptist is called "Skiri-Jon" by the Christian Goths of Iceland and Scandinavia; {V.D., 550.} and "Purification (by Water) Day" was officially called in Scotland, down to the reign of James VI., "Skiri-Thurisday." {J.S.D., 486.} Moreover, the father of John-the-Baptist was a Fire-priest, {He offered simple Fire-incense in the temple "in the course of Abia" (Luke i, 5.) ... and presumably a Gentile, and his name "Zacharias," is apparently the Sumer title of Sakhar "Baptist," with the personal affix as or "one," corresponding to the English "ist."

2 IUSA: The Great Myth of the Sun Gods by Alvin B Kuhn:

But whence comes the "s" in Jesus's name? This is of great importance. It is derived from an Egyptian suffix written either SA, SE, SI, SU, or SAF, SEF, SIF or SUF (SAPH, SEPH, SIPH or SUPH) and meaning "the son," "heir," "prince" or successor to the father. (The F is an Egyptian ending for the masculine singular.) When the original symbol of divinity, IO or IE, JO or JE, was combined with the Egyptian suffix for the succeeding heir, SU or SA, the resultant was the name IUSA, IUSE, IUSU, or IOSE; or IESU, JESU, IUSEF, IOSEF, JOSEF. One of the many forms was JESU and another was JOSEF. The final F became sibilant at times and gave us the eventual form of JESUS. The name then meant the "divine son," and combined in the Egyptian IU the idea of the coming one. Hence JESUS was the Messiah, the coming son of the divine life. There was in Egypt for ten thousand years B.C. the character of this functionary under the name of IUSA. Later he was the Iu-em-hetep, which means "the divine son who comes with peace (hetep). 

The Lost Light by Alvin B Kuhn, Chapter 21: IUSA

For many thousands of years before Christ, the prototype of all coming saviors was the Egyptian Iusa. The name is from Iu (Ia, Ie, Io or Ja, Je, Jo, Ju), the original name of biune divinity, combined with the Egyptian suffix sa (or se, si, su, or saf, sef, sif, suf), meaning, with the grammatical masculine "f," the male heir, son, successor, or prince. Iusa then means the son of the divine father Iu (Ju-piter, "father god"), or the son of Ihuh (Jehovah). He was Iu, coming as the su, or son. His mother in the Atum cult was Iusaas. He was God the son, the prince, the heir... Iusa, Solomon and Jesus were all temple builders. Iusa was the divine modeler of the spiritual temple, and an inscription says that the temple of Edfu was "restored as it is in the book of the model composed by Prince Iusa, eldest son of Ptah."  He was that seventh principle that came to bring peace (Hetep) by fusing and reducing to harmony the lower six powers which were anarchic until the advent of the Prince of Peace to subjugate them. The seventh principle is the savior and redeemer of creation. The Manes says: "I am one of those to whom it is said, Come, come, in peace, by those who look upon him"--that is, the company of the gods. He says again in Chapter 25, the "chapter of giving a heart to Osiris in the underworld:" "My soul shall not be fettered to my body at the gates of the underworld; but I shall enter in peace and I shall come forth in peace." These and similar phrases of promise are to be fulfilled on that great day, the name of which is itself significant--the day of "Come thou to me," or "the day of ‘Come unto us,’" or "Come thou hither." This was to be the opening day of the resplendent new creation. Revelation speaks of the same grand inaugural: "The spirit and the bride say ‘Come’!" (Ch. 20:11). Spirit and matter, calling from the horizon, bid us come to the crowning.

Wikipedia, Seker:

...the Egyptians in the Pyramid Texts linked his name to the anguished cry of Osiris to Isis 'Sy-k-ri' ('hurry to me')

Yule and Noel - The Saga of Christmas Part 2 by Alvin B Kuhn - IUSA:

It remains to build up the structure of the two familiar names attached closely to the Christmas gaiety. They are Yule and Noel. Nowhere has there been seen any scholar's derivation of Yule from its obvious philological sources. It almost incontestably springs from the ancient Egyptian name of Deity, IU, meaning "(the Deity) who comes," and the Hebrew EL, "God." Its total rendering would then read: "The Deity that comes as God," or, more simply, "the coming God." The Egyptians many times called Horus, or Iusa, "he who comes regularly and continually," and in hymns he is hailed and appealed to as "The Comer!" IU is the verb meaning "to come." In course of Nordic and Anglic transmission, the IU became YU and the EL more phonetically conjoined to it as LE, giving us in the end YULE. As the Divinity under zodiacal symbolism "came" at the winter solstice, the late December period became designated as the Yuletide and its festival "the Yule."

2 KRST:

Is Jesus Simply A Retelling Of The Horus Mythology?

More

More Scenarios:

Scenario 2: Zechariah's Two Sons

Scenario 3: Jesus, the Christ Whom Never Was